Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1175/jhm-d-18-0053.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multiyear Analysis of Global Precipitation Combining CloudSat and GPM Precipitation Retrievals

Abstract: Satellite-based instruments are essential to the observation of precipitation at a global scale, especially over remote regions. Each instrument has its own strengths and limitations in accurately determining the rate of precipitation at the surface. By using the complementary strengths of two instruments, a more complete analysis of global precipitation can be performed. The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Core Observatory’s Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (DPR) is capable of measuring precipitation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A diurnal cycle may not be taken into account in precipitation climatologies based on satellite products over the SO. For instance, CloudSat CPR has widely been used to study oceanic precipitation, e.g., [3,47,48]; however, since CloudSat is in a Sun-synchronous orbit, the data from this satellite only contain precipitation that occurs at the same two times every day. Further, night-time observations are not available from April 2011 onward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A diurnal cycle may not be taken into account in precipitation climatologies based on satellite products over the SO. For instance, CloudSat CPR has widely been used to study oceanic precipitation, e.g., [3,47,48]; however, since CloudSat is in a Sun-synchronous orbit, the data from this satellite only contain precipitation that occurs at the same two times every day. Further, night-time observations are not available from April 2011 onward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cloud types for precipitating profiles are presented in Figure 8, together with the cloud depth and the mean elevations of the lowest rainy cloud layers. Moderately deep (6-8 km) Ns clouds dominate everywhere producing precipitation, except for thin (<1 km) Sc clouds that dominate and produces light rain over the subtropical Pacific Ocean (e.g., Hayden and Liu, 2018). Deep (>8 km) DC clouds also produce rain on the lee of the subtropical Andes while low and thin (<1 km) Sc clouds over the extratropical Pacific Ocean (Figures 8A-C).…”
Section: Precipitating Cloud Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aircraft measurements can also give a direct estimation of RLWC with a high accuracy, but they are costly and have a limited spatiotemporal availability. Measurements from polar-orbiting satellite, such as Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM), can give spatial statistics for precipitation, but the ground track repeat time is several days (Hayden & Liu, 2018) and it is difficult to cover the microphysical profiles of a whole rainfall process at a fixed location. Micro rain radar (MRR) has the ability of measuring vertical drop size distribution and can also calculate the vertical profile of RLW; MRRs therefore provide a way to study properties of RLWC and CLWC (Ojo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, highly variable emission of the land surface in the microwave band limits the retrievals of LWC from satellite‐based measurements over land (Chen et al, 2007). Moreover, the poor temporal resolution of polar‐orbiting satellites means that it is difficult to meet the requirement of sequential analysis at fixed points (Hayden & Liu, 2018; Stephens et al, 2002). Ground‐based microwave radiometers (MWRs) can retrieve CLW profile in atmosphere and have been proved to be one of the most accurate methods for determining the CLWP (Crewell & Löhnert, 2003; Westwater, 1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%