1991
DOI: 10.1139/b91-036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multivariate morphometric study and revision of Aster subg. Doellingeria sect. Triplopappus (Compositae: Astereae): the Aster umbellatus complex

Abstract: A multivariate morphometric study of Aster subg. Doellingeria sect. Triplopappus (Compositae: Astereae) was undertaken to assess the numbers and ranks of taxa that usefully could be recognized. The results of cluster, discriminant, and principal components analyses on a matrix of 362 plants by 11 characters indicated that four species level groups can be recognized: Aster inflrmus, A. reticulatus, A. sericocarpoides, and A. umbellatus. Within A. umbellatus, analyses of a 12-character data matrix on an addition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, a primary test was applied to test the influence of sex where a Factorial Discriminant Analysis (FDA) considering sex in each sample was applied. The FDA, which helps to better discriminate samples of the same or of different species (Semple et al 1991), was performed using the SPSS software version 13 (SPSS 2004). Using Ward's method, a hierarchical clustering was performed with the FactoMineR package with R ® software (R Core Team 2014).…”
Section: Study Habitatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, a primary test was applied to test the influence of sex where a Factorial Discriminant Analysis (FDA) considering sex in each sample was applied. The FDA, which helps to better discriminate samples of the same or of different species (Semple et al 1991), was performed using the SPSS software version 13 (SPSS 2004). Using Ward's method, a hierarchical clustering was performed with the FactoMineR package with R ® software (R Core Team 2014).…”
Section: Study Habitatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several morpho-anatomical parameters were examined, i.e., 10 cephalic, 28 body and 40 body-cephalic ratios and 9 meristic parameters (detailed in [20]). For multivariate analyses Canonical Discrimination Analysis (CAN-DISC) was applied [22]. Ordination of individual samples was defined by the variable canonical components taken two by two [23].…”
Section: Biometric Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La difficulté d'identification de ces 2 espèces, étant donné leurs ressemblances morphologiques, a été l'origine de nombreuses confusions taxonomiques (Small et Jomphe, 1989). L'angle d'insertion des épines sur la gousse est souvent considéré comme le caractère botanique principal différenciant les 2 espèces (Pottier-Alapetite, 1979; Lesins, 1979;Small et Jomphe, 1989 (Rao, 1972 ;Hebrant, 1975 ;Semple et al, 1991 ;Robert et Sarr, 1991 (Lesins et al, 1971 ; Lesins, 1979 ;Small et Jomphe, 1989 Lesins, 1979et Zouari, 1981 …”
Section: Introductionunclassified