1997
DOI: 10.1080/00926239708403927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multivariate analysis of the sexual fantasy themes of college men

Abstract: Understanding sexual fantasies is important to the scientific study of human sexuality. A sexual fantasy refers to a private or covert experience in which the imagination of desirable sexual activity with a partner is sexually arousing to the individual. Prior sexual experiences of an individual appear to increase the incidence of sexual fantasies, as well as the variety of sexual themes in a fantasy, which permit a greater elaboration of the fantasy theme when compared to less sexually experienced individuals… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interest in each theme was averaged to give scores representing four content categories established previously by factor analysis (Wilson, 1988): ''Intimate,'' ''Exploratory,'' ''Impersonal,'' and ''Sadomasochistic.'' The four factor structure of the WSFQ has been confirmed across several independent studies in culturally diverse non-paraphilic populations (the factor solutions explaining *45% of the total variance; Iwawaki & Wilson, 1983;Plaud & Bigwood, 1997;Sierra, Ortega, & Zubeidat, 2006;Wilson & Lang, 1981), non-clinical paraphilic samples (for example, in men belonging to fetishistic organizations; Gosselin & Wilson, 1980), and sexual offenders (Baumgartner, Scalora, & Huss, 2002). The averaged scores representing the four factors were used to quantify the extent of paraphilic interest by computing a variance-quotient (VQ = [Impersonal + Sadomasochistic]/ [Intimate + Exploratory]), previously shown to differentiate paraphilic from conventional heterosexual men in neurophysiological and behavioral investigations (Waisman, Fenwick, Wilson, Hewett, & Lumsden, 2003).…”
Section: Measures and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Interest in each theme was averaged to give scores representing four content categories established previously by factor analysis (Wilson, 1988): ''Intimate,'' ''Exploratory,'' ''Impersonal,'' and ''Sadomasochistic.'' The four factor structure of the WSFQ has been confirmed across several independent studies in culturally diverse non-paraphilic populations (the factor solutions explaining *45% of the total variance; Iwawaki & Wilson, 1983;Plaud & Bigwood, 1997;Sierra, Ortega, & Zubeidat, 2006;Wilson & Lang, 1981), non-clinical paraphilic samples (for example, in men belonging to fetishistic organizations; Gosselin & Wilson, 1980), and sexual offenders (Baumgartner, Scalora, & Huss, 2002). The averaged scores representing the four factors were used to quantify the extent of paraphilic interest by computing a variance-quotient (VQ = [Impersonal + Sadomasochistic]/ [Intimate + Exploratory]), previously shown to differentiate paraphilic from conventional heterosexual men in neurophysiological and behavioral investigations (Waisman, Fenwick, Wilson, Hewett, & Lumsden, 2003).…”
Section: Measures and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A validation study of the Wilson SFQ in which principal components analysis with promax rotation was applied showed a similar but not identical structure to those found in the original sample of the English subjects (Plaud & Bigwood, 1997). In their study, Plaud and Bigwood used a sample of 116 men and also extracted four factors that explain 45% of the total variance, but with different nuances to the original Wilson structure.…”
Section: Dimensionality Of the Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, conceptualizations of sexual fantasies have largely assumed that cognitions are positive when they are experienced as agreeable and pleasurable (Leitenberg & Henning, 1995;Plaud & Bigwood, 1997). However, images of disagreeable situations or events may activate a kind of sexual fantasy that has an inhibiting effect on sexual response (Fisher, 1986).…”
Section: Dimensionality Of the Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four overarching content categories of sexual fantasy have been observed (Arndt et al, 1985;Crepault, Abraham, Porto, & Couture, 1976;Meuwissen & Over, 1991;Plaud & Bigwood, 1997;Smith & Over, 1987Wilson & Lang, 1981): conventional homosexual or heterosexual imagery with past, present, or imaginary lovers who are usually known to the person; scenes expressing sexual power and irresistibility; fantasies involving somewhat varied or "forbidden" sexual imagery; and submission-dominance scenes. Although there is uniformity in themes between the genders, males tend to endorse most fantasies at a higher rate than females (for a review see Leitenberg & Henning, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%