1994
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.151.10.1453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multisite investigation of the reliability of the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms

Abstract: The results suggest that the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms has good reliability and is a useful instrument for the measurement of negative symptoms in multisite clinical studies. The internal reliability of the Alogia, Avolition-Apathy, and Inattention subscales could be improved by replacing some items and including additional items.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Large effect sizes were noted in each study (i.e., differences in d were 3.39, 3.05, 4.25 and 0.80 for Alpert et al, 2000; Cohen et al, 2008; Tavano et al, 2008 and St-Hilaire et al, 2008 respectively. A summary of findings from this meta-analysis, anchored by the d values computed by Emmerson et al (2009) and Mueser et al (1994) as well as those reported in Hoekert et al (2007), are plotted in Figure 2.…”
Section: 0 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Large effect sizes were noted in each study (i.e., differences in d were 3.39, 3.05, 4.25 and 0.80 for Alpert et al, 2000; Cohen et al, 2008; Tavano et al, 2008 and St-Hilaire et al, 2008 respectively. A summary of findings from this meta-analysis, anchored by the d values computed by Emmerson et al (2009) and Mueser et al (1994) as well as those reported in Hoekert et al (2007), are plotted in Figure 2.…”
Section: 0 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notes: Increasing scores on the y-axis reflect abnormally higher vocal expression (i.e., patients versus controls); (lit) refers to comparison of data presented in Emmerson et al, (2009) and Mueser et al, (1994); “Hoekert et al, (2007)” refers to a prior meta-analysis examining behavioral-based ratings analysis of vocal expression in schizophrenia; “Present study” refers to effect sizes computed from the present meta-analysis.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This specific finding of elevated anhedonia-asociality and avolition-apathy for the “stable-poor” class—but no differences between classes in the other negative symptoms domains—may extend prior findings of an association between poor premorbid functioning and elevated negative symptoms in general (Schmael et al, 2007). Previous comprehensive factor analytic studies of the SANS have found that the anhedonia-asociality and avolition-apathy subscales cluster together in an overall “social amotivation” factor in patients with schizophrenia (Mueser et al, 1994; Sayers et al, 1996) and first-episode psychosis (Malla et al, 2002). Consistent with the current findings, Sayers and colleagues also found that the “social amotivation” factor was associated with the existence of child behavior problems, poor premorbid functioning, and poor social adjustment.…”
Section: ) Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%