2009
DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2009/02/p02004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiscale view on inverse statistics and gain/loss asymmetry in financial time series

Abstract: Researchers have studied the first passage time of financial time series and observed that the smallest time interval needed for a stock index to move a given distance is typically shorter for negative than for positive price movements. The same is not observed for the index constituents, the individual stocks. We use the discrete wavelet transform to illustrate that this is a long rather than short time scale phenomenon -if enough low frequency content of the price process is removed, the asymmetry disappears… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This asymmetry is expressed by negative return levels being reached sooner than those corresponding to positive levels (of the same magnitude of ρ). This effect was termed the gain-loss asymmetry [7] and has later been observed for many major stock indices [7,8,18,19,23,25]. It is here important to note that the gain-loss asymmetry is not a consequence of the generally long-term positive trend (or drift) of the data since this was removed by considering an average with a suitable window size on the prices.…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This asymmetry is expressed by negative return levels being reached sooner than those corresponding to positive levels (of the same magnitude of ρ). This effect was termed the gain-loss asymmetry [7] and has later been observed for many major stock indices [7,8,18,19,23,25]. It is here important to note that the gain-loss asymmetry is not a consequence of the generally long-term positive trend (or drift) of the data since this was removed by considering an average with a suitable window size on the prices.…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This is consistent with the findings of Kahneman and Tversky [31], reported in the economics literature, that demonstrate that the utility loss of negative returns is larger than the utility gain for positive returns in the case of most investors. Recently, the idea of the fear-factor model [24] was reconsidered and generalized by Siven et al [25] by allowing for longer time periods of stock co-movement (correlations). These authors also find that the gain-loss asymmetry is a long timescale phenomena [25], and that it is related to some correlation properties present in the time series [21].…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 in Appendix). All these results suggest a much reduced characteristic time-scale for the non-Pearson type auto-correlations that are responsible for the gain-loss asymmetry than that reported in [33].…”
Section: Characteristic Time-scalesmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Contrary to indices, stock prices show a smaller degree of asymmetry [22][23][24]. The asymmetry of the inverse statistics of stock markets is still a central problem of applied mathematics, econophysics and economics [19,26,33,34].…”
Section: Gain-loss Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%