2014
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiscale statistical mechanical framework integrates biophysical and genomic data to assemble cancer networks

Abstract: Functional interpretation of genomic variation is critical to understanding human disease but it remains difficult to predict the effects of specific mutations on protein interaction networks and the phenotypes they regulate. We describe an analytical framework based on multiscale statistical mechanics that integrates genomic and biophysical data to model the human SH2-phosphoprotein network in normal and cancer cells. We apply our approach to data in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and test model predictions e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we mainly focus on several classic systemic modeling approaches and their applications in current cancer research. These popular modeling approaches can simulate the dynamic changes of regulatory networks (signaling pathways and metabolic pathways), tumor growth, and its microenvironments, such as ordinary differential equations (ODEs) [10], Boolean network [18], Petri nets [19], linear programming (LP) based model [9, 20], agent-based model [11], and the system biology modeling approach considering genetic variation [21]. We present these models in Figure 1.…”
Section: Several Classical Systemic Modeling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we mainly focus on several classic systemic modeling approaches and their applications in current cancer research. These popular modeling approaches can simulate the dynamic changes of regulatory networks (signaling pathways and metabolic pathways), tumor growth, and its microenvironments, such as ordinary differential equations (ODEs) [10], Boolean network [18], Petri nets [19], linear programming (LP) based model [9, 20], agent-based model [11], and the system biology modeling approach considering genetic variation [21]. We present these models in Figure 1.…”
Section: Several Classical Systemic Modeling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How to integrate the information of genetic variations in the systemic modeling work is now a new topic . AlQuraishi et al first proposed a multiscale statistical mechanical framework integrated genomic, binding, and structural data to predict the effects of specific mutations on PPI networks and cancer-related pathways [21]. Based on the concept of Hamiltonian, they modeled how the mutations in SH2 domains induced network alterations and the experimental results validated the proposed model.…”
Section: Several Classical Systemic Modeling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, pathways can be inferred from “omics” analyses of biological samples. 16,17 In particular, samples that are blood based (i.e., liquid biopsies) can easily be collected longitudinally and correlated with disease progression. 18 …”
Section: Present Focus On Target-centric and Phenotypic Discovery: A mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How genes and proteins interact with each other is the basis of molecular biology and disease pathogenesis 1,2 . These functional interactions, which biologists place into pathways, have been characterized through hypothesis-driven experiments and then manually defined in the past 3,4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%