2018
DOI: 10.1615/intjmultcompeng.2018025518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multiscale Mesh-Free Approach to Modeling Damage of an Ultra-High-Performance Concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiments consisted of hydrostatic compression, triaxial compression, unconfined direct pull, and uniaxial load/constant volume tests. The quasi static results were documented by Williams et al 43 and the dynamic unconfined compressive strength, and the resulting dynamic increase factor, were characterized by Martin et al 44 The UHPC fracture energy was obtained by Sherburn et al 45 using the three-point notched beam test developed by Hillerborg et al 46 A mode I crack initiated at the notch and propagated through the beam, and the resulting fracture energy was determined from the crack tip opening displacement (CTOD). From the physical test, macroscale constitutive parameters, ie, elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio, peak tensile strength, and fracture energy, were identified and documented for use during the numerical validation study.…”
Section: Microcell Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments consisted of hydrostatic compression, triaxial compression, unconfined direct pull, and uniaxial load/constant volume tests. The quasi static results were documented by Williams et al 43 and the dynamic unconfined compressive strength, and the resulting dynamic increase factor, were characterized by Martin et al 44 The UHPC fracture energy was obtained by Sherburn et al 45 using the three-point notched beam test developed by Hillerborg et al 46 A mode I crack initiated at the notch and propagated through the beam, and the resulting fracture energy was determined from the crack tip opening displacement (CTOD). From the physical test, macroscale constitutive parameters, ie, elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio, peak tensile strength, and fracture energy, were identified and documented for use during the numerical validation study.…”
Section: Microcell Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiments consisted of hydrostatic compression, triaxial compression, unconfined direct pull, and uniaxial load/constant volume tests. The quasi static results were documented by Williams et al and the dynamic unconfined compressive strength, and the resulting dynamic increase factor, were characterized by Martin et al The UHPC fracture energy was obtained by Sherburn et al using the three‐point notched beam test developed by Hillerborg et al A mode I crack initiated at the notch and propagated through the beam, and the resulting fracture energy was determined from the crack tip opening displacement (CTOD). From the physical test, macroscale constitutive parameters, ie, elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio, peak tensile strength, and fracture energy, were identified and documented for use during the numerical validation study.…”
Section: Validation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%