2012
DOI: 10.1063/2.1205103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiscale material point method for impact simulation

Abstract: To better simulate multi-phase interactions involving failure evolution, the material point method (MPM) has evolved for almost twenty years. Recently, a particle-based multiscale simulation procedure is being developed, within the framework of the MPM, to describe the detonation process of energetic nano-composites from molecular to continuum level so that a multiscale equation of state could be formulated. In this letter, a multiscale MPM is proposed via both hierarchical and concurrent schemes to simulate t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the above simulations did not consider large deformation and they doi: 10.1007/s11431-015-5780-9 simplified the soft material. Furthermore, it is difficult to use the FEM in the modeling and simulation of material failure, since changing the material geometry in response to failure would require constant re-meshing [6]. In contrast to the FEM, some mesh-free methods such as the Galerkin method [7], smoothed particle hydrodynamics method [8], and material point method (MPM) [9] have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the above simulations did not consider large deformation and they doi: 10.1007/s11431-015-5780-9 simplified the soft material. Furthermore, it is difficult to use the FEM in the modeling and simulation of material failure, since changing the material geometry in response to failure would require constant re-meshing [6]. In contrast to the FEM, some mesh-free methods such as the Galerkin method [7], smoothed particle hydrodynamics method [8], and material point method (MPM) [9] have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its first introduction [1,2], the material point method has been used in many problems involving large material deformations [3,4,5,6,7,8] in which a traditional finite element method encounters difficulties due to mesh or element distortion. Although both the finite element method and the material point method seek approximate weak solutions to the partial differential equations, there are two significant differences that result in different numerical properties of the methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, each of the hierarchical/sequential or multi-level refinement approaches just mentioned requires a transition region between different spatial scales, which limits their usefulness for the study of physical situations where discrete nano/micro structures (for example, nano/micro rods and beams in energetic composites) interact with each other. Recently, a particle-based multiscale procedure has been proposed wherein cluster dynamics (CD) is linked hierarchically with MD for sub-micron scale domains and concurrently with the MPM for simulations on larger scales [15]. The method was used to explore the longitudinal impact response between two metallic microrods with different nanostructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was used to explore the longitudinal impact response between two metallic microrods with different nanostructures. However, the CD method used in [15] relies on certain assumptions that limit the range of applicability, and much work remains to generalize the method to more realistic situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation