2022
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2022.3150581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multiscale Convolutional Registration Network for Defect Inspection on Periodic Lace Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [14], a large lace dataset was proposed for the first time, which focused on the differences between the high-level semantic features extracted by the neural network, and a de-deformation defect detection network was proposed for lace surface defect detection. In order to fit the actual production scenario more, Xu et al [15] proposed a method for detecting and locating periodic lace surface defects, which only required defect-free image samples, reconstructed contrast tweens by extracting image tweens and their corresponding flaws to increase the morphological similarity of input image pairs, and then detected defects on the residual plot between the output and the image to be measured. However, these methods are only good at detecting lace hole and broken yarn, not friendly to other lace defects.…”
Section: Existing Defect Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14], a large lace dataset was proposed for the first time, which focused on the differences between the high-level semantic features extracted by the neural network, and a de-deformation defect detection network was proposed for lace surface defect detection. In order to fit the actual production scenario more, Xu et al [15] proposed a method for detecting and locating periodic lace surface defects, which only required defect-free image samples, reconstructed contrast tweens by extracting image tweens and their corresponding flaws to increase the morphological similarity of input image pairs, and then detected defects on the residual plot between the output and the image to be measured. However, these methods are only good at detecting lace hole and broken yarn, not friendly to other lace defects.…”
Section: Existing Defect Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%