2016
DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2016.1232701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multiregional Impact Assessment Model for disaster analysis

Abstract: This paper presents a recursive dynamic multiregional supply-use model, combining linear programming and input-output (I-O) modeling to assess the economy-wide consequences of a natural disaster on a pan-European scale. It is a supply-use model which considers production technologies and allows for supply side constraints. The model has been illustrated for three floods in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Results show that most of the neighboring regions gain from the flood due to increased demand for reconstructio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
88
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model was originally developed for the entire European Union, consisting of 256 NUTS 2 regions, 59 products and 14 sectors (Koks and Thissen 2016), following the European Classification of Products by Activity (Nace 1.1 -CPA 2002). For the purpose of this paper, only the 20 Italian regions are considered, and the rest of Europe is aggregated into a single unit.…”
Section: Model Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model was originally developed for the entire European Union, consisting of 256 NUTS 2 regions, 59 products and 14 sectors (Koks and Thissen 2016), following the European Classification of Products by Activity (Nace 1.1 -CPA 2002). For the purpose of this paper, only the 20 Italian regions are considered, and the rest of Europe is aggregated into a single unit.…”
Section: Model Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinear optimization has been combined with IO modeling techniques to overcome these issues, thus providing the simplicity of IO modeling (i.e., Leontief production function) while allowing for some more flexibility (Baghersad and Zobel 2015;Oosterhaven and Bouwmeester 2016). One such approach can be found in the MultiRegional Impact Assessment (MRIA) model (Koks and Thissen 2016). With the use of the MRIA model, the first aforementioned issue is tackled by using optimization techniques to solve the model, which allows for taking endogenous import and supply constraints into account in an essentially demand-determined model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, articles with explicit transportation network modeling but missing economic analysis were not included because these works only study the impacts of transportation disturbances from an engineering point of view, largely focusing on infrastructure management, transportation safety, traffic optimization, etc. Lastly, studies investigating the economic impacts of the disruptions to other kinds of infrastructure systems (e.g., power plants or water supply system disruptions) or papers without a clear analysis of the losses resulting from the disturbance of the transportation sector were removed from the review inventory (Aloughareh et al 2016;Koks and Thissen 2016;). This way, 25 articles were identified, and another 17 articles were found by surveying the references of the original 25 or by going through their listed publications of the authors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They compare the regional and national disaster impacts of two flooding scenarios for the Italian Po River delta, as estimated with, respectively, the adaptive regional input-output (ARIO) model developed by Hallegate (2008), a regionalized version of the CGE model developed by Standardi, Bosello, and Eboli (2014), as applied by Carrera, Standardi, Bosello, and Mysiak (2015), and the multiregional impact assessment (MRIA) model of Koks and Thissen (2016). The latter model resembles our own approach most.…”
Section: Testing the Impact Of Assuming Fixed Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%