2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4822162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multireference configuration interaction study of CuB and CuAl molecular constants and photoionization spectra

Abstract: Accurate potential energy curves and molecular constants for the low-lying electronic states of CuX(y) (X = B, Al; y = 0, +1) were investigated using the complete active space self-consistent field/multireference configuration interaction (MRCI) methodology with aug-cc-pV5Z basis set. The photoionization spectra of CuX were computed, showing electron detachment in the region of far ultraviolet. The results complement the previous theoretical characterizations and the few experimental studies. A comparative ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The BDE of NiB has been measured to be 3.431(4) eV, so an assignment of 3.780(19) eV to the CuB BDE would violate the established D 0 (NiX) ≫ D 0 (CuX) trend for 2p ligands. Moreover, high-level MRCI+Q calculations predict D 0 (CuB) = 2.10 or 2.18 eV. , In the current work, CCSD­(T)/CBS calculations give D 0 (CuB) = 2.26 eV (see Supporting Information, Table S1). All of these are far less than the 3.780(19) eV predissociation threshold of Figure .…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The BDE of NiB has been measured to be 3.431(4) eV, so an assignment of 3.780(19) eV to the CuB BDE would violate the established D 0 (NiX) ≫ D 0 (CuX) trend for 2p ligands. Moreover, high-level MRCI+Q calculations predict D 0 (CuB) = 2.10 or 2.18 eV. , In the current work, CCSD­(T)/CBS calculations give D 0 (CuB) = 2.26 eV (see Supporting Information, Table S1). All of these are far less than the 3.780(19) eV predissociation threshold of Figure .…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Moreover, high-level MRCI+Q calculations predict D 0 (CuB) = 2.10 or 2.18 eV. 35,36 In the current work, CCSD(T)/CBS calculations give D 0 (CuB) = 2.26 eV (see Supporting Information, Table S1). All of these are far less than the 3.780(19) eV predissociation threshold of Figure 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…As summarized recently by us [5], the 3d transition metal borides have been studied by quantum chemical methods [6][7][8][9]. Experimentally, the dissociation energies of ScB and TiB [10] were obtained and the electronic transitions on CoB were explored [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%