2007
DOI: 10.1002/ppul.20749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiplex PCR‐based reverse line blot hybridization (mPCR/RLB) assay for detection of bacterial respiratory pathogens in children with pneumonia

Abstract: The mPCR/RLB assay is a sensitive tool for identification of respiratory pathogens, including mixed infections and bacteria requiring special culture methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This involves development of assays that are symptom based and can detect multiple respiratory pathogens, including B. pertussis (55)(56)(57)(58). A disadvantage of the latter approach can be that multiple sets of primers may reduce the sensitivity of detection.…”
Section: Pcr Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This involves development of assays that are symptom based and can detect multiple respiratory pathogens, including B. pertussis (55)(56)(57)(58). A disadvantage of the latter approach can be that multiple sets of primers may reduce the sensitivity of detection.…”
Section: Pcr Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously developed a simple method to rapidly detect and identify bacterial and fungal pathogens using PCR followed by hybridization with species-specific oligonucleotides in a reverse line blot (RLB) assay (20,32,34). This approach has the capacity for the simultaneous analysis of a large number (ϳ40) of strains against multiple probes and can be adapted to include different gene targets within the same assay (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Tampoco se evaluó sistemáticamente la presencia de Mycoplasma pneumoniae y el cultivo fue la única forma de pesquisa bacteriana, a pesar de que los métodos moleculares podrían incrementar la identificación de estos agentes patógenos. 18 Sin embargo, los méto-dos empleados son exactamente iguales que los utilizados por Moreno y cols., 6 al estudiar su escala simplificada y que los de la descripción original BPS, 7 por lo que es muy poco probable que las diferencias observadas no se relacionen con lo antes mencionado. Además, fuera de lo considerado para el virus influenza, no hay evidencia de que se haya modificado sustancialmente el patrón epidemiológico de las neumonías en el escaso tiempo transcurrido entre ambos estudios (2 años), ni desde la descripción original del BPS (6 años).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified