2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiple objective stochastic programming model for working capital management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Working capital management significantly contributes to firm value by maintaining a balance between risk and profitability [5,7,[9][10][11][12][13]. Depending upon managers' preferences, this balance may have a range of strategies including high risk-high profit (aggressive strategy) or low risk-low profit (conservative strategy) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working capital management significantly contributes to firm value by maintaining a balance between risk and profitability [5,7,[9][10][11][12][13]. Depending upon managers' preferences, this balance may have a range of strategies including high risk-high profit (aggressive strategy) or low risk-low profit (conservative strategy) [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term debt has a positive impact on the company's liquidity as it is a source of funds that could enhance liquidity (Masri & Abdulla, 2018). In common-law systems, companies tend to have lower levels of working capital, less internal sourcing of working capital from retained profits, and more external sourcing from banks (Troilo, Walkup, Abe, & Lee, 2019).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, a large number of models were proposed by extending these work. Abdelaziz et al [26] assumed that the parameters related to the target obeyed the normal distribution and proposed a stochastic multi-objective programming portfolio model, then transformed it into an chance-constrained compromise programming model for solution; Li et al [27] used expectation value and variance as the composite quantitative indicators of random variables, and established the generalized expectation model of stochastic programming; for the uncertainties existed in inventory, transportation cost and demand in the recycling logistics network, Sazvar et al [28] proposed a stochastic programming model based on expected value; Masri et al [29] established a multi-objective stochastic programming model based on the retailer's optimal working capital level, and proposed multiple solution strategies based on chance constrained approach, a recourse approach and stochastic goal programming approach; Tong et al [30] used random variables to describe the target under uncertain demand, established a bi-level programming model of stochastic multi-objective logistics network design and further designed genetic algorithm (GA) based on stochastic simulation for solution; Fard et al [31] established a twostage stochastic multi-objective programming model for closedloop supply chain (CLSC) considering environmental factors and downside risk. Moreover, a number of memetic metaheuristics had been considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%