2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2015.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiple marker level-set method for simulation of deformable fluid particles

Abstract: A novel multiple marker level-set method is introduced for Direct Numerical Simulation of deformable fluid particles (bubbles and droplets), which is integrated in a finite-volume framework on collocated unstructured grids. Each fluid particle is described by a separate level-set function, thus, different interfaces can be solved in the same control volume, avoiding artificial and potentially unphysical coalescence of fluid particles. Therefore, bubbles or droplets are able to approach each other closely, with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Conservative Level-Set method (CLS) used in the present work was developed by Balcázar et al [21], in the framework of finite-volume discretization and unstructured meshes. This method greatly reduces the problem of mass conservation of the standard Level-Set methods, and it was thoroughly verified in [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Conservative Level-Set method (CLS) used in the present work was developed by Balcázar et al [21], in the framework of finite-volume discretization and unstructured meshes. This method greatly reduces the problem of mass conservation of the standard Level-Set methods, and it was thoroughly verified in [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently, [29] has introduced a conservative level-set method (CLS) where mass conservation problem is greatly reduced, while an hyperbolic tangent function is employed as the level-set function. Moreover, this approach has been generalized to unstructured meshes by [1,2,3], in the framework of finite-volume discretizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CLS formulation dramatically reduces the mass conservation error in comparison with a standard level set method. This technique has been thoroughly verified [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The CLS method has been designed for general unstructured meshes [29]. Indeed, the grid can be adapted to any domain, enabling for an efficient mesh distribution in regions where interface resolution has to be maximized [28,29,31,34,35], which is difficult by using structured grids. Furthermore, a TVD fluxlimiter scheme [29] is used to advect the CLS function, avoiding numerical oscillations around discontinuities, whereas the numerical diffusion is minimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%