2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-016-0890-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiple kernel learning algorithm for drug-target interaction prediction

Abstract: BackgroundDrug-target networks are receiving a lot of attention in late years, given its relevance for pharmaceutical innovation and drug lead discovery. Different in silico approaches have been proposed for the identification of new drug-target interactions, many of which are based on kernel methods. Despite technical advances in the latest years, these methods are not able to cope with large drug-target interaction spaces and to integrate multiple sources of biological information.ResultsWe propose KronRLS-M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
116
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With an appropriate kernel function, the original training data are mapped into a higher dimension to solve non‐linear problems. Here, in this work, we chose the pairwise kernel as our kernel function, which has been successfully applied in the predictions of protein‐protein interactions and drug‐target interactions …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With an appropriate kernel function, the original training data are mapped into a higher dimension to solve non‐linear problems. Here, in this work, we chose the pairwise kernel as our kernel function, which has been successfully applied in the predictions of protein‐protein interactions and drug‐target interactions …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, in this work, we chose the pairwise kernel as our kernel function, which has been successfully applied in the predictions of protein-protein interactions 24 and drug-target interactions. 25 In addition, an error penalty parameter denoted as C, where C > 0, is called the soft-margin constant. To achieve satisfying classification result, the parameters in SVM should be chosen appropriately.…”
Section: Support Vector Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 2, objects are new indicates that no corresponding DTIs in the training data, and known vice versa. In order to facilitate the comparison with other methods, we followed previous studies [32,[56][57][58] as the benchmark and conducted the 10-fold cross-validations (CVs) test for each experimental setting of each data set, and the above process was repeated 5 times using different random seeds.…”
Section: Experimental Settings and Cross-validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) based on association rules, drugs with similar chemical structures tend to bind similar proteins. It is based on heterogeneous networks of DTIs, using single or fusion similarity measures as features [23,31,32,58].…”
Section: Predictive Ability Of Different Types Of Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These similarities play a key role and can be derived from various types of data. Our survey shows that the target similarities are mostly obtained on the basis of genomic sequence, e.g., sequence similarity by structural and physicochemical features or by sequence alignment score, though a few other target features were also used (42), including biological function (43), domain annotation (44), and proximity in the protein-protein interaction network (45). In comparison, data from the drug perspective is much more diverse as shown below.…”
Section: Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%