1942
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1942.9917111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multiphasic Personality Schedule (Minnesota): III. the Measurement of Symptomatic Depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
100
0
3

Year Published

1943
1943
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
100
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Presence of depression and/or anxiety is determined by a T-score ≥ 70. Hathaway and McKinley (1942) offer reliability coefficients of .77 for scale 2 and .74 for scale 7.…”
Section: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (Mmpi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presence of depression and/or anxiety is determined by a T-score ≥ 70. Hathaway and McKinley (1942) offer reliability coefficients of .77 for scale 2 and .74 for scale 7.…”
Section: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (Mmpi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of the internal consistency of the SDS have found Cronbach alpha coefficients in excess of 0.80 (Schaefer et al, 1985;Tanaka-Matsumi & Kameoka, 1986). Schaefer et al (1985) found better criterion-related validity for the SDS than for either the Beck Depression Inventory (Beck, 1967), or the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Depression Scale (Hathaway & McKinley, 1942). SDS scores range between 20 and 80, and Zung (1965) recommended the following clinical cut-offs: less than 41 (not depressed), 41-47 (mildly depressed), 48-55 (moderately depressed), and greater than 55 (severely depressed).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The scale correlates highly with the Beck Depression Inventory (Beck, Ward, Mendelson, Mock, & Erraugh, 1961), with reported zero order correlations of 0.76 and 0.81 (Schaeffer et al, 1985). High correlations have also been reported between the SDS and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (Hamilton, 1960), r = 0.8 (Biggs, Wylie, & Ziegler, 1978), the Depression Scale of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI; Hathaway & McKinley, 1942), r = 0.61 and 0.73 (Schaeffer et al, 1985), and the MMPI-2 Depression Scale (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kraemmer, 1989), r = 0.77 (Thurber, Snow & Honts, 2002). The scale has been shown to effectively discriminate between depressed and non-depressed samples (Biggs et al, 1978;de Jonghe & Baneke, 1989;Gabrys & Peters, 1985;Schaeffer et al, 1985;Thurber et al, 2002), and to adequately distinguish between mild, moderate and severe depressive symptoms (Biggs et al, 1978).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%