2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jctb.2015.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multipartite Hajnal–Szemerédi theorem

Abstract: Abstract. The celebrated Hajnal-Szemerédi theorem gives the precise minimum degree threshold that forces a graph to contain a perfect K k -packing. Fischer's conjecture states that the analogous result holds for all multipartite graphs except for those formed by a single construction. Recently, we deduced an approximate version of this conjecture from new results on perfect matchings in hypergraphs. In this paper, we apply a stability analysis to the extremal cases of this argument, thus showing that the exact… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the proof of Theorem 1.1 there have been many generalizations obtained in several directions. For example, Kühn and Osthus [38] characterized, up to an additive constant, the minimum degree which ensures that a graph G contains a perfect H-tiling for an arbitrary graph H. Keevash and Mycroft [27] proved an analogue of the Hajnal-Szemerédi theorem in the setting of r-partite graphs, whilst there are now several generalizations of Theorem 1.1 in the setting of directed graphs (see e.g., [11,12,48]). See [37] for a survey including many of the results on graph tiling.…”
Section: Perfect Tilings In Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the proof of Theorem 1.1 there have been many generalizations obtained in several directions. For example, Kühn and Osthus [38] characterized, up to an additive constant, the minimum degree which ensures that a graph G contains a perfect H-tiling for an arbitrary graph H. Keevash and Mycroft [27] proved an analogue of the Hajnal-Szemerédi theorem in the setting of r-partite graphs, whilst there are now several generalizations of Theorem 1.1 in the setting of directed graphs (see e.g., [11,12,48]). See [37] for a survey including many of the results on graph tiling.…”
Section: Perfect Tilings In Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Hajnal‐Szemerédi Theorem was proved many years ago, there has been significant recent activity on related theorems. For example, Alon‐Yuster , Komlós‐Sárközy‐Szemerédi and Kühn‐Osthus have all proved theorems similar to the Hajnal‐Szemerédi Theorem where complete graphs factors are replaced with H ‐factors where H is an arbitrary graph; Kierstead‐Kostochka proved the Hajnal‐Szemerédi Theorem with an Ore‐type degree condition ; Fischer , Martin‐Szemerédi , and Keevash‐Mycroft have proved multipartite variants; and Wang , Keevash‐Sudakov , Czygrinow‐Kierstead‐Molla , Czygrinow‐DeBiasio‐Kierstead‐Molla , Treglown and Balogh‐Lo‐Molla have all proved analogues of the Hajnal‐Szemerédi Theorem in directed and oriented graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A factor of transversals is a set of pairwise-disjoint transversals covering all vertices. The problem of finding sufficient conditions for the existence of independent transversals and factors of independent transversals in k-partite graphs was studied by several researchers [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,12,13,14,15,16,17] not least because it is strongly related to the Hajnal-Szemerédi Theorem and to concepts such as the strong chromatic number and list coloring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the modified Fischer's Conjecture implies Conjecture 1. The modified Fischer's Conjecture has been solved for k = 3 and large n by Magyar and Martin [13], for k = 4 and large n by Martin and Szemerédi [14] and, finally, for every fixed k and sufficiently large n = n(k) by Keevash and Mycroft [10]. However, as all of these proofs require n to be very large compared to k, they do not imply Conjecture 1 nor an upper bound close to the conjecture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%