2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2006.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiobjective model for the selection and timing of public enterprise projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
20
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…When the projects can begin on different time moments, the research on this problem is limited 6,25,29 .…”
Section: Literature Review: Project Evaluation Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the projects can begin on different time moments, the research on this problem is limited 6,25,29 .…”
Section: Literature Review: Project Evaluation Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed model is based on the one by Medaglia et al (2008), which was later extended by Palacio (2010) for the MRCPSP/max (with time lags). Despite the fact that some building blocks are shared, modelling labour stability brings several new elements and challenges into the model that makes it unique on its own.…”
Section: Optimization Model and Solution Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in some contexts, projects might be subject to precedence relations (Medaglia et al, 2008). Let the set of precedence relations between projects be Input parameters: denoted by A, that is, if project iAI precedes project i 0 AI, then (i, i 0 )AA.…”
Section: Model Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the criteria "Requirement for Personal Presence at the submission of the application" and "Requirement for Personal Presence at the delivery of the service" were unified to lead to the more generic one "Requirement for Personal Presence" mainly due to the different nature of each public service scenario under investigation. Moreover, the Services Description Template seems to totally overlook the political dimension of a public service [23] downgrading its role to the decision making procedure in the public sector.…”
Section: P No Of Inputs Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%