2016
DOI: 10.3102/0002831215621786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multination Study of Socioeconomic Inequality in Expectations for Progression to Higher Education

Abstract: Persistent inequalities in educational expectations across societies are a growing concern. Recent research has explored the extent to which inequalities in education are due to primary effects (i.e., achievement differentials) versus secondary effects (i.e., choice behaviors net of achievement). We explore educational expectations in order to consider whether variations in primary and secondary effects are associated with country variation in curricular and ability stratification. We use evidence from the PIS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
1
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
4
70
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…However, supporting our claim that this is not conducive to more equitable outcomes, the degree of ability stratification is associated with a negative relationship between social class and aspirations and attainment and a weaker relationship between self-beliefs and task values and these outcomes (see Parker et al, 2016). This is not to say that BFLPE type processes are not in operation for aspirations and attainment; empirical research suggests they are (e.g., Marsh, 1991).…”
Section: Signaling and Inequalitysupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, supporting our claim that this is not conducive to more equitable outcomes, the degree of ability stratification is associated with a negative relationship between social class and aspirations and attainment and a weaker relationship between self-beliefs and task values and these outcomes (see Parker et al, 2016). This is not to say that BFLPE type processes are not in operation for aspirations and attainment; empirical research suggests they are (e.g., Marsh, 1991).…”
Section: Signaling and Inequalitysupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Likewise, as we imply in our set of counterfactual models in Study 2, there is no guarantee that reducing secondary effects can be done in a way that keeps primary effects constant. Countries in our research that had the largest gap in self-beliefs and values favoring working class children also tended to have the largest gap in achievement favoring salariat children and the largest proportion of the total effect of social class on aspirations explained by achievement (based on Parker et al, 2016).…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Ross () combined items on students’ attitudes towards school, school work and lessons (a 10‐item scale) with a measurement of their truancy and school leaving aspirations. In England, students’ expectations for attending higher education are associated with their social class (Chowdry et al ., ; Parker et al ., ) therefore possibly explaining why SES differences were observed in Ross’ () study and not in ours. Also, Janosz et al .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…An often‐cited counterargument is that tracking creates homogenous classes and thus reduces positive spillover effects from stronger students (Zimmer ). More complex arguments refer to the impact of tracking on educational inheritance and educational returns (e.g., Allmendinger ; Parker, Jerrim, Schoon and Marsh ). As we will argue, tracking may also have an impact on social reproduction, depending on how direct effects of social origin are affected.…”
Section: Education and School Tracking As Central Elements Of Social mentioning
confidence: 99%