2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multimodal Discourse Analysis Approach to Humour in Conference Presentations: The Case of Autobiographic References

Abstract: Humour plays an important role in human-to-human interaction and as so it has attracted the attention of researchers when analysing discourse (Kyratzis, 2003;Long & Graesser, 2009). Yet, these analyses have focused on conversation (Attardo et al., 2011(Attardo et al., , 2013, taking the point of view of semantics (Kyratzis, 2003), pragmatics and cognitive linguistics (Attardo et al., 2011(Attardo et al., , 2013. There are very few multimodal discourse analyses that focus on oral academic research genres in gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Work has been done on spoken discourse together with, for example, intonation (Halliday and Greaves 2008), proxemics (Lim et al 2012), or gestures (Kendon 2004). In addition, others have analysed speakers' effective use and combination of semiotic resources (multimodal ensembles) to support comprehension (Norte Fernández-Pacheco 2018), interaction (Morell 2004), amusement (Ruiz-Madrid andFortanet-Gómez 2015), persuasion (Valeiras-Jurado et al 2018), solidarity (Hood and Forey 2005) and engagement (Forey and Feng 2016). These Multimodal Discourse Analysis (MDA) studies, informed by Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), focus on the overall communicative effect of the multimodal ensembles rather than on the individual modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work has been done on spoken discourse together with, for example, intonation (Halliday and Greaves 2008), proxemics (Lim et al 2012), or gestures (Kendon 2004). In addition, others have analysed speakers' effective use and combination of semiotic resources (multimodal ensembles) to support comprehension (Norte Fernández-Pacheco 2018), interaction (Morell 2004), amusement (Ruiz-Madrid andFortanet-Gómez 2015), persuasion (Valeiras-Jurado et al 2018), solidarity (Hood and Forey 2005) and engagement (Forey and Feng 2016). These Multimodal Discourse Analysis (MDA) studies, informed by Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), focus on the overall communicative effect of the multimodal ensembles rather than on the individual modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…whether they make the presentation memorable, elicit interest, laughter etc.). Along this line, works such as Ruiz-Madrid and Fortanet-Gómez (2015a) show, for instance, how speakers convey intentional humour through multimodal ensembles as they make autobiographic references, in order to keep the attention of the audience and contribute to a relaxed atmosphere.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to analyse different aspects of multimodal texts or multimodal phenomena. With each of these theories come different frameworks and methodologies such as O' Halloran's (2004) intersemiotic and resemiotisation, Norris's (2008), Jewitt & Jones' (2008), Ruiz-Madrid & Fortanet-Gomez's (2015 qualitative study in office, classroom ability, and humorous conference presentations contexts, Bower & Hedberg's (2010) quantitative study in (teaching and learning) web-conferencing context, and Hong's (2012) ethnographic and quantitative study in teaching English language skills context. This study applies the qualitative approach to the study of multimodal resources.…”
Section: Multimodal Discourse Analysis (Mda)mentioning
confidence: 99%