2021
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.709027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multimodal Affinity Fusion Network for Predicting the Survival of Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract: Accurate survival prediction of breast cancer holds significant meaning for improving patient care. Approaches using multiple heterogeneous modalities such as gene expression, copy number alteration, and clinical data have showed significant advantages over those with only one modality for patient survival prediction. However, existing survival prediction methods tend to ignore the structured information between patients and multimodal data. We propose a multimodal data fusion model based on a novel multimodal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CNA and gene expression data had unknown and null values during preprocessing-the weighted nearest neighbor algorithm [47] was used to remove and normalize these unwanted data points [5]. The gene expression features were further discretized and classified as underexpressed (-1), baseline (0), or overexpressed (1). With five discrete values, the CNA features remain unchanged (2, 1, 0, 1, 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…CNA and gene expression data had unknown and null values during preprocessing-the weighted nearest neighbor algorithm [47] was used to remove and normalize these unwanted data points [5]. The gene expression features were further discretized and classified as underexpressed (-1), baseline (0), or overexpressed (1). With five discrete values, the CNA features remain unchanged (2, 1, 0, 1, 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the heterogeneity of these data has led to complexity because of the significant differences in dimensionality and data types. The process of integrating these data types into a single predictive model is complex [1]- [3]. A prognosis estimates the probability of risk, such as complications or death, occurring over a given period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Literature studies have used supervised or weakly supervised learning methods or proposed fused models for a more accurate diagnosis of WSIs. The fused models [ 35 , 36 ] have demonstrated better computational performance than the specific set of optimal feature extractors, but these models are more dependent on the selected set of features or classifiers, which might not work with relatively rare types of cancer cases, extracted from WSI data. In contrast, our study helps to obtain sufficient information from WSIs, by using any number of independent multiple descriptors for unsupervised learning of features, and later, different classifiers (supervised) can be used to achieve high performance for any type of WSI classification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%