A multilocus molecular phylogeny of Fasciolariidae (Neogastropoda: Buccinoidea)

Couto, Diogo Ribeiro; Bouchet, Philippe; Kantor, Yuri I.; Simone, Luiz Ricardo L.; Giribet, Gonzalo

doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2016.03.025

Cited by 22 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 51 publications

(51 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This sampling strategy also explains why the MNHN collections were cited in 62% of the mollusc species descriptions published in 2017, and that almost all the recently published molecular phylogenies of neogastropods are based, partly or entirely, on MNHN material (e.g. Modica et al 2011;Fedosov et al 2015;Couto et al 2016;Galindo et al 2016). In the case of the Conoidea, for which all the previously published phylogenies are also based mostly on MNHN material, this strategy led to the inclusion of several recently discovered lineages and to the description of several new families.…”

Section: Phylogenetic Reconstructionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exon-Capture-Based Phylogeny and Diversification of the Venomous Gastropods (Neogastropoda, Conoidea)

Abdelkrim

Aznar-Cormano

Fedosov

et al. 2018

Molecular Biology and Evolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Transcriptome-based exon capture methods provide an approach to recover several hundred markers from genomic DNA, allowing for robust phylogenetic estimation at deep timescales. We applied this method to a highly diverse group of venomous marine snails, Conoidea, for which published phylogenetic trees remain mostly unresolved for the deeper nodes. We targeted 850 protein coding genes (678,322 bp) in ca. 120 samples, spanning all (except one) known families of Conoidea and a broad selection of non-Conoidea neogastropods. The capture was successful for most samples, although capture efficiency decreased when DNA libraries were of insufficient quality and/or quantity (dried samples or low starting DNA concentration) and when targeting the most divergent lineages. An average of 75.4% of proteins was recovered, and the resulting tree, reconstructed using both supermatrix (IQ-tree) and supertree (Astral-II, combined with the Weighted Statistical Binning method) approaches, are almost fully supported. A reconstructed fossil-calibrated tree dates the origin of Conoidea to the Lower Cretaceous. We provide descriptions for two new families. The phylogeny revealed in this study provides a robust framework to reinterpret changes in Conoidea anatomy through time. Finally, we used the phylogeny to test the impact of the venom gland and radular type on diversification rates. Our analyses revealed that repeated losses of the venom gland had no effect on diversification rates, while families with a breadth of radula types showed increases in diversification rates, thus suggesting that trophic ecology may have an impact on the evolution of Conoidea.

show abstract

Section: Phylogenetic Reconstructionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exon-Capture-Based Phylogeny and Diversification of the Venomous Gastropods (Neogastropoda, Conoidea)

Abdelkrim

Aznar-Cormano

Fedosov

et al. 2018

Molecular Biology and Evolution

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although the fossil species are apparently peristerniines, the Recent species were in their majority suspected to be most closely related to Granulifusus Kuroda & Habe, 1954 in the subfamily Fusininae Wrigley, 1927. Their close affinity was confirmed by the molecular phylogenetic analysis of Couto et al (2016). In the molecular phylogenetic section we present a more detailed analysis of the relationships of 10 Recent Pseudolatirus-like species, erect two new fusinine genera, Okutanius gen. nov. (type species Fusolatirus kuroseanus Okutani, 1975) and Vermeijius gen. nov. (type species Pseudolatirus pallidus Kuroda & Habe, 1961).…”

mentioning

confidence: 81%

“…In many cases attribution of species to genera and genera to subfamilies is done by tradition, without an explicit discussion of the values of these characters. Only recently the phylogeny of the entire family was addressed from a molecular point of view, with the first multilocus molecular tree of Fasciolariidae (Couto et al 2016), resulting in drastic changes in the composition of the three currently recognized subfamilies. In particular, the subfamily Peristerniinae Tryon, 1880 appeared to be restricted to Peristernia Mörch, 1852 (non-monophyletic) and Fusolatirus Kuroda & Habe, 1971.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pseudolatirus Bellardi, 1884 revisited, with the description of two new genera and five new species (Neogastropoda: Fasciolariidae)

Kantor

Fedosov

Snyder

et al. 2018

EJT

Self Cite

701

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The genus Pseudolatirus Bellardi, 1884, with the Miocene type species Fusus bilineatus Hörnes, 1853, has been used for 13 Miocene to Early Pleistocene fossil species and eight Recent species and has traditionally been placed in the fasciolariid subfamily Peristerniinae Tryon, 1880. Although the fossil species are apparently peristerniines, the Recent species were in their majority suspected to be most closely related to Granulifusus Kuroda & Habe, 1954 in the subfamily Fusininae Wrigley, 1927. Their close affinity was confirmed by the molecular phylogenetic analysis of Couto et al. (2016). In the molecular phylogenetic section we present a more detailed analysis of the relationships of 10 Recent Pseudolatirus-like species, erect two new fusinine genera, Okutanius gen. nov. (type species Fusolatirus kuroseanus Okutani, 1975) and Vermeijius gen. nov. (type species Pseudolatirus pallidus Kuroda & Habe, 1961). Five species are described as new for science, three of them are based on sequenced specimens (Granulifusus annae sp. nov., G. norfolkensis sp. nov., Okutanius ellenae gen. et sp. nov.) and two (G. tatianae sp. nov., G. guidoi sp. nov.) are attributed to Granulifusus on the basis of conchological similarities to sequenced species. New data on radular morphology is presented for examined species.

show abstract

“…5). Diversos trabalhos filogenéticos baseados em dados moleculares vêm sendo publicados tratando da relação entre os neogastrópodes e até mesmo específicos sobre as relações dos nassarídeos (e.g., Cunha et al 2009;Couto et al 2016;Galindo et al 2016).…”

Section: Fig 1-cladograma Extraído Deunclassified

“…A seleção dos grupos externos foi baseada nas filogenias de Simone, 2011. Galindo et al 2016Couto et al 2016. Para o teste da monofila de Nassariinae foram selecionados táxons originados de outros grupos dentro da ordem Neogastropoda, por exemplo, pseudoolivídeos, turbinelídeos e fasciolarídeos além das outras subfamílias de Nassariidae.…”

Section: Analise Filogenéticaunclassified

Estudo filogenético da subfamília Nassariinae (Neogastropoda, Buccinoidea, Nassariidae)

Abbate¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Nassariidae family is a group of detritivores marine snails that inhabit sands substrates and intertidal zone. The family belongs to the superfamily Buccinoidea and is considered closely related to Buccinidae family. It is considered a monophyletic taxon and has the following synapomorphies: cephalic tentacles twice larger than the head, presence of epipodiais tentacles, central radular tooth multicuspidated and no bursa copulatrix in palial oviduct of females. According to the latest suggestions of phylogenetic classification, the Nassariidae internal arrangement has not yet reached a consensus and the number of subfamilies is still not exact. This paper presents a detailed morphological study of some representatives of Buccinoidea and Nassariidae to test the monophyly of this clade and elucidate the phylogenetic position of the genera of each family clade. All Nassariidae genres are represented, and are represented mostly by the type species, totaling an internal group represented by 24 species. The out group is represented by other Buccinoidea and one Pseudolividae (Benthobia atafona), considered for rooting, totaling 13 species. A cladistic analysis with heuristic searches with equal weights for each character and a differential weighing, determined by specific constant (K) was performed. The result of the analysis confirmed the monophyly of Nassariidae, however confirmed the monophyly only two subfamilies: Nassariinae and Buccinanopsinae. Some systems were analyzed more accurately and shown to be potentially informative, especially for more specific taxa.

show abstract

A multilocus molecular phylogeny of Fasciolariidae (Neogastropoda: Buccinoidea)

Cited by 22 publications

References 51 publications

Exon-Capture-Based Phylogeny and Diversification of the Venomous Gastropods (Neogastropoda, Conoidea)

Exon-Capture-Based Phylogeny and Diversification of the Venomous Gastropods (Neogastropoda, Conoidea)

Pseudolatirus Bellardi, 1884 revisited, with the description of two new genera and five new species (Neogastropoda: Fasciolariidae)

Estudo filogenético da subfamília Nassariinae (Neogastropoda, Buccinoidea, Nassariidae)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About