2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00791.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multilevel Framework for Effective Interagency Collaboration in Mental Health

Abstract: The difficulty of coordinating service provision in interagency programs is a challenge for many working in public policy. We reflect on lessons learned through evaluating two interagency supported housing programs for people with mental illness and propose a framework outlining components needed for well co-ordinated service provision. We specify collaborative mechanisms at the policy, agency, service and client level. The key component is the role of an 'integration coordinator': a person who is able to faci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the intergroup contact theory, contact between members of different groups can enable discovery of mutual similarities, which can dismantle perceived barriers to relationship building and generate positive change to potential stereotypical attitudes [ 47 ]. Shepherd and Meehan referred to interpersonal communication as the ‘glue’ of interagency collaboration [ 48 ]. However, some diabetes educators reported that a lack of informal relationships made them feel disconnected from the primary care site team.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the intergroup contact theory, contact between members of different groups can enable discovery of mutual similarities, which can dismantle perceived barriers to relationship building and generate positive change to potential stereotypical attitudes [ 47 ]. Shepherd and Meehan referred to interpersonal communication as the ‘glue’ of interagency collaboration [ 48 ]. However, some diabetes educators reported that a lack of informal relationships made them feel disconnected from the primary care site team.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the work of Freeman [ 27 ] we can see that they are “learning by meeting” with the micro-interactions of the meetings building personal and collective practice. Shepherd and Meehan [ 13 ] further point to interpersonal communication as “the ‘glue’ of interagency collaboration”. However without effective and open networking this type of communication becomes problematic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term SF is not commonly used outside of the PIR setting. The only relevant use of the term that could be located in the literature was the use of the term ‘supports facilitator’ to describe a similar role working within Disability Services Queensland to support people living with mental illness who had been discharged from psychiatric hospitals into the community [ 13 ]. However, the type of role that the SF provides is not unique, with various names being given to similar roles including ‘integration coordinator’, ‘boundary spanner’, ‘care coordinator’, ‘case manager’, ‘system agent’, ‘brokerage case manager’ and ‘broker’ [ 13 – 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nestes contextos, entidades desencadeadoras (Doz et al, 2000) podem intervir deliberadamente na promoção da rede, buscando convencer as potenciais firmas-membro de que existe uma oportunidade ou um problema a ser resolvido, e que uma configuração de rede seria útil para tratar a situação (Johanson & Lundberg, 2010). Esses agentes especificamente encarregados da governança, em termos de coordenação e gerenciamento destas redes são reconhecidos como, organização administrativa da rede (Human & Provan, 2000;Provan & Kenis, 2008), firma central (Dhanaraj & Parkhe, 2006), construtor de capacidade colaborativa (E. R. Weber & Khademian, 2008), líder (Muller-Seitz, 2012), coordenador de integração (Shepherd & Meehan, 2012), orquestrador (Paquin & Howard-Grenville, 2013), arquiteto , dentre outros.…”
Section: Redes Emergentes X Redes Orquestradasunclassified
“…A literatura reconhece esse tipo de organização sob diferentes nomenclaturas a exemplo de, entidades desencadeadoras (Doz et al, 2000), organizações administrativas de rede (Human & Provan, 2000;Provan & Kenis, 2008), firmas centrais (Dhanaraj & Parkhe, 2006), construtores da capacidade colaborativa (Weber & Khademian, 2008), organizações líderes (Provan & Kenis, 2008; Müller-Seitz, 2012) coordenadores de integração (Shepherd & Meehan, 2012), orquestradores de rede (Paquin & Howard-Greenville, 2013), arquitetos de rede , dentre outros.…”
Section: Governança E Gestão Em Redes Estratégicas Regionaisunclassified