2004
DOI: 10.1163/1571806053498724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multilevel Approach to Investigating Cross-National Differences in Negotiation Processes

Abstract: The impact of the psychological states of the negotiators, the social conditions of negotiations, and the behavior of negotiators on the outcomes of negotiations differs from country to country. Various suboptimal, individual-level, and country-level solutions have been suggested to predict and explain such cross-national variations. Drawing inspiration from a series of cross-cultural studies on job satisfaction and motives for volunteer work that successfully employed multilevel modeling, we propose a multile… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, according to the research, grasping the negotiation style and characteristics of the other party is conducive to successful negotiation. However, the process of understanding the other party's negotiation culture is challenging [30]. Therefore, in order to negotiate effectively with Chinese negotiators in international business negotiations, foreign negotiators must have a deep understanding of how culture affects China's negotiation style.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, according to the research, grasping the negotiation style and characteristics of the other party is conducive to successful negotiation. However, the process of understanding the other party's negotiation culture is challenging [30]. Therefore, in order to negotiate effectively with Chinese negotiators in international business negotiations, foreign negotiators must have a deep understanding of how culture affects China's negotiation style.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%