2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04424-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multilevel Analysis of the Relationship Between Ethical Leadership and Ostracism: The Roles of Relational Climate, Employee Mindfulness, and Work Unit Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 presents descriptive statistics. Due to multiple parameters in the measurement model, relative to sample size, we followed previous research (e.g., Christensen-Salem et al, 2020;Ogunfowora et al, 2019) and created two parcels for each longer scale with more than four items (i.e., all our study variables) using random item distribution (Landis et al, 2000). The proposed six-factor model with supervisor BLM, trait competitiveness, perceived competitive climate, insomnia, and two components of thriving at work fit the data better (χ 2 = 107.29, df = 39, p < .001, CFI = .93, TLI = .89, RMSEA = .10, SRMR = .05) than alternative ones 2 .…”
Section: Analytical Strategy and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 presents descriptive statistics. Due to multiple parameters in the measurement model, relative to sample size, we followed previous research (e.g., Christensen-Salem et al, 2020;Ogunfowora et al, 2019) and created two parcels for each longer scale with more than four items (i.e., all our study variables) using random item distribution (Landis et al, 2000). The proposed six-factor model with supervisor BLM, trait competitiveness, perceived competitive climate, insomnia, and two components of thriving at work fit the data better (χ 2 = 107.29, df = 39, p < .001, CFI = .93, TLI = .89, RMSEA = .10, SRMR = .05) than alternative ones 2 .…”
Section: Analytical Strategy and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to multiple parameters in the measurement model, relative to sample size, we followed previous research (e.g. Babalola et al, 2019a;Christensen-Salem et al, 2020;Ogunfowora et al, 2019) and created two parcels for each longer scale with more than four items (i.e. all our study variables) using random item distribution (Landis et al, 2000).…”
Section: Analytical Strategy and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we extend the peer abusive supervision literature by highlighting the unique role of witnessing abusive supervision in provoking harassment and ostracism behavior toward victim employees. We add to the limited research stream on the antecedents of peer harassment and ostracism (Christensen-Salem et al 2020). Third, although emerging work has demonstrated that abusive supervision can be directly and indirectly detrimental to victims' job performance (e.g., Harris et al 2007;Pan and Lin 2018), our study goes one step further by including both job performance and creative performance in the investigation, implying the generalization of our findings in two separate samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Both peer harassment and peer ostracism violate workplace norms of respect (Ferris et al 2017). Ideally, a leader enacting positive leadership (e.g., ethical leaders or transformational leadership) would condemn harassment and ostracism behavior because they are unethical and toxic to employee performance (Christensen-Salem et al 2020). However, when the leader him/herself is abusive to employees, it is unlikely that he/she would explicitly criticize peer employees' mistreatments.…”
Section: Peer Harassment and Peer Ostracism As Mediatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ethical parts of ethical leadership centres around trustworthiness, genuineness, and judicious and principled basic leadership, Eubank, Christensen-Salem et al (2020). People learn from their leaders by watching those actions which are practiced repeatedly, what is compensated or acknowledged and what conduct prompts correction/punishment.…”
Section: Literature Review Ethical Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%