A multilevel analysis of the role personality play between work organization conditions and psychological distress

Abstract

Background Psychological distress in the workplace is usually attributed to work-related variables as well as non-work-related variables. Individuals working in the same organization can differ in terms of their appraisal of work-related stressors and coping strategies used to face them. The present study aims to evaluate the moderating role personality plays between work organizations conditions and psychological distress in a large sample of Canadian participants working in various occupations and workplaces. Methods Multilevel regression analyses were conducted on a sample that followed a hierarchical structure with workers (N1 = 1958) nested in workplaces (N2 = 63). The direct contribution of workplace and personality was tested in a variance component model as a first step. Following this initial step, we introduced interaction variables by blocks of 11. Those interaction variables refer to each interaction combined with a specific personality variable. Results Psychological demands, number of hours worked, job insecurity, neuroticism, and agreeableness were associated with higher levels of psychological distress. Inversely, decision authority, job recognition, self-esteem, locus of control were associated with lower levels of psychological distress. Lastly, agreeableness played a moderating role between low social support garnered from one’s supervisor and psychological distress. Conclusions To intervene on work-related variables, organizations could reduce psychological demands, minimize the number of hours worked through job redesign, allow teleworking and encourage work schedule flexibility. To reduce job insecurity, organizations could explicitly communicate future organizational plans. In the same vein, decision authority could be targeted by reducing hierarchical steps and increasing autonomy. Lastly, the results pertaining to agreeableness stand in contrast with those of previous studies. We assumed that workers scoring high on agreeableness tend to put themselves last and please others first. These tendencies could make them more susceptible to health issues. With that said, work environments still need workers who are agreeable and nice to be around. To prevent high levels of agreeableness leading to psychological distress, training and information workshops are recommended. Those include stress management interventions and workshops pertaining to time management and relaxation techniques.

Prediction and Influencing Factors of Big Data on College Students’ Positive Psychological Quality under Mobile Wireless Network

“…With these data, the metric accuracy, precision, false rate, and processing time are comparatively analyzed by varying the observations and classi cations. In this comparative analysis, EAM-Bi-LSTM [16], EDM-DL [17], and MA-RP [25] methods are compared with proposed BPRM method.…”

“…Parent-Lamarche et al [25] introduced a multilevel regression analysis process to identify psychological distress in the workplace. e hierarchical structure of employees is collected and used in the regression analysis process.…”

Teleworking, Work Engagement, and Intention to Quit during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Same Storm, Different Boats?

“…According to the COR theory, individuals with a greater pool of resources (e.g., favorable organizational and individual characteristics) are less vulnerable to resource loss and more capable of resource gain [76], a cycle that determines employees' successful adaptation to their work environments. Individuals can differ in their appraisal of work organization conditions [77] (in this study, in their teleworking), leading to differences in their work engagement and intention to quit. Work characteristics can influence the effect of teleworking on work engagement and intention to quit.…”

A Moderated Mediation Analysis of New Work-Related Stressors, Psychological Distress, and Absenteeism in Health Care During a Pandemic

“…We were unable to identify empirical studies that specifically addressed the moderating role of recognition in these relationships. However, the direct effects of recognition are conspicuous in the literature, which indicates that recognition is associated with lower psychological distress 41 and lower absenteeism. 42 Therefore, the following hypotheses are postulated:…”