2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-021-05631-z
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multigenerational study on phenotypic consequences of the most common causal variant of HNF1A-MODY

Abstract: Aims/hypothesis Systematic studies on the phenotypic consequences of variants causal of HNF1A-MODY are rare. Our aim was to assess the phenotype of carriers of a single HNF1A variant and genetic and clinical factors affecting the clinical spectrum. Methods We conducted a family-based multigenerational study by comparing heterozygous carriers of the HNF1A p.(Gly292fs) variant with the non-carrier relatives irrespective of diabetes status. During more than t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 12 , 13 A recent study with a single pathogenic variant in HNF1A also found lower penetrance in extended family members supporting our results in the population cohort. 37 Our results showing reduced risk of disease in clinically unselected individuals have important clinical implications for the incidental finding of monogenic diabetes and a wide range of other monogenic disorders. Our data suggest that intensive close monitoring of the onset of diabetes may not be necessary for people with incidentally identified pathogenic variants in HNF1A and HNF4A due to a substantially lower risk of diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 12 , 13 A recent study with a single pathogenic variant in HNF1A also found lower penetrance in extended family members supporting our results in the population cohort. 37 Our results showing reduced risk of disease in clinically unselected individuals have important clinical implications for the incidental finding of monogenic diabetes and a wide range of other monogenic disorders. Our data suggest that intensive close monitoring of the onset of diabetes may not be necessary for people with incidentally identified pathogenic variants in HNF1A and HNF4A due to a substantially lower risk of diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…These suggest that the inherent risk of diabetes with pathogenic variants is constant irrespective of the setting and that the variation in the observed absolute risk of diabetes is due to varying proportions of non-variant factors (environmental or/and genetic modifiers). 11 , 37 These results also suggest that these factors are proportionally more in family members and less in the UK Biobank participants. Further studies across different settings are needed to identify genetic or non-genetic modifiers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Indeed, a high genome-wide burden of common risk alleles from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) confers a risk of diseases including diabetes that approaches the risk of single pathogenic Mendelian mutations [40]. Moreover, the penetrance of diabetes in those with HNF1A mutations is significantly influenced by polygenic type 2 diabetes risk score [41,42]. Interactions among rarer alleles are also likely, but adequately powered studies to identify genetic modifiers agnostically in rare disease are notoriously challenging or impossible for all but the least rare disease-causing mutations.…”
Section: Monogenic Insulin-deficient Diabetes As the Sentinel Feature...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequencing and the mixed-meal tolerance test (MMTT) in an individual with a pathogenic variant in the KCNJ11 gene were performed in collaboration with the FINNMODY study [ 14 ], which identified and characterised individuals with a suspected or established diagnosis of monogenic diabetes in Finland from 2014 onwards ( www.botnia-study.org/finnmody ). The results of the MMTT were compared with 45 control individuals without diabetes from the Botnia Study described previously [ 15 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%