Abstract:MATERIALS AND METHODS Chemicals and media. Tetracycline hydrochloride, isopropyl-13-D-thiogalactopyranoside, o-nitrophenyl-,B-D-galactopyranoside, and the protein molecular weight standards ovalbumin, a-chymotrypsinogen, and lysozyme were purchased from Sigma Chemical 633 on July 31, 2020 by guest
“…Analysis of the amino acid sequence of the McbR protein already revealed a DNA binding domain characteristic for the TetR family of transcriptional regulators (Rey et al, 2003). All of the experimentally well-characterized members of this family such as TetR (Beck et al, 1982), ArcR (Ma et al, 1996) and MtrR; (Lucas et al, 1997) act as transcriptional repressors by binding to DNA in the absence of corresponding effector molecules. In the presence of the effector, the repressor protein can no longer bind to the operator sequence, enforcing its rapid dissociation from the DNA (Hillen et al, 1983).…”
Section: Identification Of the Mcbr Effector Substance By Emsa And Sumentioning
“…Analysis of the amino acid sequence of the McbR protein already revealed a DNA binding domain characteristic for the TetR family of transcriptional regulators (Rey et al, 2003). All of the experimentally well-characterized members of this family such as TetR (Beck et al, 1982), ArcR (Ma et al, 1996) and MtrR; (Lucas et al, 1997) act as transcriptional repressors by binding to DNA in the absence of corresponding effector molecules. In the presence of the effector, the repressor protein can no longer bind to the operator sequence, enforcing its rapid dissociation from the DNA (Hillen et al, 1983).…”
Section: Identification Of the Mcbr Effector Substance By Emsa And Sumentioning
“…Thirdly, a movement of dimerization helices A8, A10, A8′ and A10′ (a prime refers to the second unit of the dimer) could cause a rotation of both monomers against each other bringing the DNA recognition helices closer together. The epitopes of the mAbs used here are located in different functional domains (see Figs 1,5): 4F5 and Top19 recognize the DNA binding domain, 9F10 and 4G5 bind to A10 in the dimerization region and 7D5, 6G7, Tc14 and To32 recognize epitopes near the Tc-binding pocket. The locations of their epitopes make these mAbs suitable tools to investigate those conformational changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tn10 encoded class B determinant has been most intensively studied. Tc dependent regulation of resistance expression is mediated by the 23.3-kDa Tet repressor protein (TetR) on the level of transcription [5]. In the absence of Tc, TetR dimers bind to tandem operators (tetO1 and tetO2) of nearly identical sequences.…”
We isolated five monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) made against tetracycline repressor (TetR), one against the TetR tetracycline complex (Tc) and two against theTetR‐tet operator (tetO) complex. The epitopes of the anti‐TetR mAbs are localized in the α‐helix‐turn‐α‐helix motif (HTH), at different sites near the Tc binding pocket and at the dimerization interface. The anti‐TetR‐Tc and one of the anti‐TetR‐tetO mAbs recognize epitopes near the Tc binding pocket. The other anti‐TetR‐tetO mAb binds to an epitope within the HTH. Quantitative immunoprecipitation and competitive ELISA employing TetR, TetR‐Tc, or TetR‐tetO revealed different affinities of the mAbs for TetR in these functional states. Binding of the two mAbs to epitopes in the HTH was identical for TetR and TetR‐Tc indicating the same conformation in both forms. The epitope located in the dimerization interface is bound more strongly in TetR compared to TetR‐Tc, supporting the idea of different conformations of that epitope in these forms of TetR. The greatest affinity differences were found for epitopes around the Tc binding pocket. Two anti‐TetR mAbs have the highest affinities for free TetR, somewhat reduced affinity for TetR‐tetO and the lowest affinities for TetR‐Tc. The anti‐TetR‐Tc mAb has a discontinuous epitope, formed in TetR‐Tc, which is less well bound in TetR and not bound in the TetR‐tetO complex. One anti‐TetR‐tetO mAb does not recognize TetR‐Tc. Since the epitopes do not overlap with the respective ligand binding sites on TetR, these results are interpreted as conformational differences of the epitopes in these forms of TetR.
“…It harbors the Tn10 transposon, which confers resistance to tetracycline (Tc). Several aspects of the Tn10 biology have been thoroughly studied in the last decades, among them the mechanisms underlying Tc resistance (Beck et al, 1982;Smith and Bertrand, 1988;Aldema et al, 1996) and transposition regulation (Kleckner et al, 1996;Kennedy et al, 1998;Ross et al, 2013). In addition to transposition and Tc resistance specific determinants, Tn10 encodes several other genes, namely jemA, orf 2, 3, 4 (Chalmers et al, 2000), tetC and tetD (Braus et al, 1984) (Supporting Information Fig.…”
In this report, we show that bacterial plasmids that harbor the Tn10 transposon (i.e., the IncHI1 plasmid R27) modify expression of different Salmonella regulons responding to the presence of tetracycline (Tc) in the medium. By using as a model the Tc-dependent upregulation of the ibpAB operon (which belongs to the heat shock regulon), we have identified Tn10-tetA (coding for a Tc efflux pump) and adjacent tetC sequences as required for ibpAB upregulation. Characterization of transcripts in the tetAC region showed that tetA transcription can continue into tetC sequences, generating a long 3'UTR sequence, which can protect transcripts from RNA processing, thus increasing the expression of TetA protein. In the presence of Tc, the DnaK and IbpA chaperones are overexpressed and translocated to the periplasm and to the membrane fraction respectively. DnaK targeting unfolded proteins is known to induce heat shock by avoiding RpoH proteolysis. We correlate expression levels of Tn10-encoded TetA protein with heat shock induction in Salmonella, likely because TetA activity compromises protein secretion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.