2016
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multifunctional AAV–CRISPR–Cas9 and its host response

Abstract: CRISPR-Cas9 delivery by AAV holds promise for gene therapy but faces critical barriers due to its potential immunogenicity and limited payload capacity. Here, we demonstrate genome engineering in postnatal mice using AAV-split-Cas9, a multi-functional platform customizable for genome-editing, transcriptional regulation, and other previously impracticable AAV-CRISPR-Cas9 applications. We identify crucial parameters that impact efficacy and clinical translation of our platform, including viral biodistribution, e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
425
1
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 516 publications
(444 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
9
425
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A split Cas9 AAV system, which relies on the trans -splicing machinery, was recently described as a way of circumventing the capacity limitation of AAV vectors (Chew et al, 2016). However, it is unclear whether modest levels of in vivo TGA achievable with this split system are sufficient to induce phenotypic change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A split Cas9 AAV system, which relies on the trans -splicing machinery, was recently described as a way of circumventing the capacity limitation of AAV vectors (Chew et al, 2016). However, it is unclear whether modest levels of in vivo TGA achievable with this split system are sufficient to induce phenotypic change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, our in vivo CRISPR/Cas9 TGA system did not generate DNA breaks. Furthermore, it has recently been shown that AAV-mediated delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 does not induce extensive cellular damage in vivo (Chew et al, 2016). Despite these advantages, further studies are needed before this strategy can be applied in the clinic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, plasmid DNA delivery is often inefficient, especially in vivo, and can cause integration of small plasmid fragments degraded by endogenous nucleases at on-target and offtarget sites in the genome ). Viral delivery of Cas9 can be highly efficient in vivo (Ran et al 2015;Long et al 2016;Nelson et al 2016;Tabebordbar et al 2016), but may be hampered by antibodies or T cells induced against the protein (Shankar et al 2007;Calcedo et al 2015;Chew et al 2016). We and others have shown that preassembled Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) can be delivered to human primary and stem cells and mice to modify target genes Schumann et al 2015;Zuris et al 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the development of antibodies against Cas9 has been documented in AAV-treated mice. 62 One potential solution is the inclusion in the vector of an additional guide RNA that targets the Cas9 gene itself, resulting in cleavage of the vector that self-limits the duration of expression. 63 An entirely different solution would be the use of lipid nanoparticles to deliver Cas9 messenger RNA into hepatocytes, relieving the size restriction imposed by AAV, as well as providing Cas9 in a form that is rapidly degraded in cells.…”
Section: Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%