1995
DOI: 10.1109/36.406693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multifrequency laboratory investigation of attenuation and scattering from volcanic ash clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assumed spherical particles, with log-normal size distributions, and a refractive index of 2.5 + 0.4i. These are educated guesses, based on available literature, for example Manabe et al (1992) and Bredow et al (1995).…”
Section: Observation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed spherical particles, with log-normal size distributions, and a refractive index of 2.5 + 0.4i. These are educated guesses, based on available literature, for example Manabe et al (1992) and Bredow et al (1995).…”
Section: Observation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger particles scatter much more strongly (σ/πr 2 ∝ (kr) 4 , σ denotes radar cross section) than smaller particles. 9) The S11 at the distance 1.44 meters is -45 dB. The attenuation of solid bulk coke, which is caused by dust, is less than 1 dB.…”
Section: Influence Of Particle Size On Propagationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…6 seem to correspond to volcanic ash results. 9) This is partly because the concentration has impact on dielectric constant. For gas flow prediction the dielectric constant of BF dust is assumed to be constant.…”
Section: Influence Of Dust Concentration On Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that paper, the complex refractive index of 2.288+0.0568i is based on the average value found for a number of dry dust particles. In the frequency range 10.0–18.0 GHz, Bredow et al [1995] estimated the complex refractive index of volcanic basaltic ash particles to be about 2.34+0.2i. In this paper, it is assumed that the complex refractive index found for mineral dust and basaltic ash particles at low microwave frequencies is valid at the ISMAR frequencies.…”
Section: Assumptions and Bulk Scattering Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scarcity of such studies is probably due to the lack of knowledge regarding the dielectric properties of various aerosol materials at microwave frequencies. The dielectric properties of volcanic ash particles have only been reported for frequencies between 4 to 19 GHz [ Adams et al , 1996], for basaltic ash particles in the region 10.0–18.0 GHz by Bredow et al [1995], and for mineral dust aerosol particles in the X‐band region (8.0–12.0 GHz) by Ghobrial and Sharief [1987]. Other reasons why there have been so few studies at higher microwave frequencies could be due to the lack of knowledge concerning particle geometric shape and the shape of the particle size distribution function (PSD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%