2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00420.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multifaceted Tool for a Complex Phenomenon: Coding Web-Based Interactivity as Technologies for Interaction Evolve

Abstract: Analysis of interactivity in Web sites is an important extension of a long tradition of analyzing content of media messages. But both interactivity and online analysis of content and features offer unique challenges to researchers. This study develops and tests a tool for measuring interactivity in the context of health-related Web sites. The tool was flexible enough to distinguish among multiple types of interactivity and powerful enough to show differences in interactivity based on domain type. Thus, it shou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hwang et al (2002 andPaul (2001) analyze the homepages and others focus on two or more levels (Okazaki & Rivas, 2002). McMillan et al (2008) propose two levels, the home page and the level one to measure interactivity. She notes that fewer features are found at home page and there is a positive correlation between homepage and level one.…”
Section: Unit Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hwang et al (2002 andPaul (2001) analyze the homepages and others focus on two or more levels (Okazaki & Rivas, 2002). McMillan et al (2008) propose two levels, the home page and the level one to measure interactivity. She notes that fewer features are found at home page and there is a positive correlation between homepage and level one.…”
Section: Unit Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, McMillan, Hoy, Kim, and McMahan (2008) categorized three types of interactivity on the Internet: human-to-computer interactivity (e.g., navigation); human-to-human interactivity (opportunities to contact the organization, make a suggestion to a friend, or share the content on one's own page); and human-to-content interactivity (opportunities to comment on organizational posts and respond to other users' posts). Based on the aforementioned considerations, we propose the following research question: RQ1: What strategies do Portuguese and Brazilian companies use to preserve companiespublic relationships on Facebook?…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several coding schemes from the literature on new media (Buis & Carpenter, 2009;McMillan et al, 2008;Waters et al, 2009) were combined to analyze interactivity and involvement: organizational contact information (e.g., email, phone number, physical address); navigation (hyperlinks to external content); opportunities for commenting and sharing; action features for Facebook engagement (polls, SNS applications, games, quizzes); and whether corporate communicators responded to user comments, thereby completing the dialogic loop.…”
Section: Coding Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total we analysed 500 first-level (start) web pages (159 homepages of cities, 341 start pages of the city departments) with a link-depth of two levels each. First, the start page was searched for interactive tools and coded, from top left to bottom right (as described by McMillan, Hoy, Kim, & McMahan, 2008). Secondly, the coders clicked all links on the start page (from top left to bottom right) and then coded the connected websites within the city"s domain.…”
Section: Table 1: About Herementioning
confidence: 99%