2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multifaceted study of interpersonal functioning and cognitive biases towards social stimuli in adolescents with eating disorders and healthy controls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the overall sample ( N = 67), participants reported high levels of interpersonal sensitivity, as indicated by the global score of the interpersonal sensitivity measure ( M = 112.80, SD = 12.54). In a previous study, adolescents with eating disorders scored significantly higher on this measure compared to healthy controls (Rowlands et al, 2021 ). Participants scored highly on the severity of eating disorder psychopathology, based on norms for adolescents with anorexia nervosa (Jennings & Phillips, 2017 ), and 40/67 (60%) scored in the clinical range for the EDE‐Q total, based on the widely used cut‐off score of 4 (Meule, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the overall sample ( N = 67), participants reported high levels of interpersonal sensitivity, as indicated by the global score of the interpersonal sensitivity measure ( M = 112.80, SD = 12.54). In a previous study, adolescents with eating disorders scored significantly higher on this measure compared to healthy controls (Rowlands et al, 2021 ). Participants scored highly on the severity of eating disorder psychopathology, based on norms for adolescents with anorexia nervosa (Jennings & Phillips, 2017 ), and 40/67 (60%) scored in the clinical range for the EDE‐Q total, based on the widely used cut‐off score of 4 (Meule, 2021 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Post-intervention interpersonal sensitivity measure (M = 112.80, SD = 12.54). In a previous study, adolescents with eating disorders scored significantly higher on this measure compared to healthy controls (Rowlands et al, 2021). Participants scored highly on the severity of eating disorder psychopathology, based on norms for adolescents with anorexia nervosa (Jennings & Phillips, 2017) Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics for participants included in the main analyses are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: Baseline Demographic and Clinical Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This association underlined the possible role of insufficient social support or social abilities in the face of complex events [35]; these factors have already been cited as core elements in the development and maintenance of eating psychopathology [42][43][44], and should be explored in more detail in patients' sisters in future studies. Laboratory tasks have explored and reported specific negative effects of social interaction in individuals with EDs, indicating the presence of interpretation bias, fear for negative evaluations, and less physiological arousal in social interactions [43,[45][46][47]. Conversely, depressive symptoms have been confirmed as related to posttraumatic symptomatology in community samples during the COVID-19 pandemic [48], with differences in patients which could be explained by the presence of higher scores in women with EDs for both depressive and posttraumatic symptomatology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%