A multidisciplinary team approach for nutritional interventions conducted by specialist nurses in patients with advanced colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy
Abstract:Background & aims:Nutritional interventions for malnutrition in cancer patients can be helpful. However, concise intervention recommendations remain controversial. Thus, the aim of this study was to report on a nutrition intervention conducted by a multidisciplinary team of specialist nurses and to explore the effect of nutritional intervention on cancer patients.Methods:This prospective clinical trial study enrolled 110 colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. The patients were evaluated upon admis… Show more
“…One psychosocial, two nutritional, and one physical activity interventions were included for review. [ 28 29 30 31 ] The comparability of study outcomes was limited because the study populations (cancer type or stage), objectives, and outcome measures were inconsistent among these studies.…”
“…One psychosocial, two nutritional, and one physical activity interventions were included for review. [ 28 29 30 31 ] The comparability of study outcomes was limited because the study populations (cancer type or stage), objectives, and outcome measures were inconsistent among these studies.…”
“…The RCT from Ravasco et al (2012) also showed that intensive nutritional counseling of colorectal cancer patients is the most effective means of improving nutritional status during radiotherapy. Lin et al (2017) and Dobrila-Dintinjana et al (2013) also demonstrated that individual nutritional counseling and administration of dietary supplements reduced weight loss and improved appetite in colorectal cancer patients, thus stabilizing nutritional status and reducing chemotherapyinduced morbidity. In the current study, the intensity of nutritional counseling depended on the frequency of GI side effects, which were most frequent in the intervention group with the use of inand outpatient counseling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the large catchment area of the hospital, consultations were occasionally carried out by telephone. The following areas were addressed: the selection of suitable foods and drinks with concrete portion sizes; methods of food preparation; distribution of total quantities over smaller more frequent meals; enrichment of meals with sources of energy and protein; and oral nutritional supplementation (Lin et al 2017 ). Between counseling sessions, patients kept a food and bowel diary, which was used to adapt the specific nutritional recommendations after each session depending on side effects and body weight (Arends et al 2017 ).…”
Introduction
Due to frequent treatment side effects and weight loss, colorectal cancer patients require oncologic care and nutritional counseling both during and after hospitalization. The current study evaluated differences in discharge and side effects management and nutritional behavior between colorectal cancer patients of a control group without systematic counseling and of an intervention group with access to structured in- and outpatient oncology nurse and nutritional counseling.
Methods
The presented explorative, quantitative, single-center, interventional pilot study is a health services research project with a quasi-experimental design. Using a self-designed standardized questionnaire, data were collected from the control group (n = 75) before and from the intervention group (n = 114) after the introduction of in- and outpatient oncology nurse and structured systematic nutritional counseling. The in- and outpatient counseling services were developed and evaluated in the form of a structured nurse-led counseling concept.
Results
Intervention group patients profited significantly from inpatient oncology nurse counseling in seven different areas of discharge management. No differences were observed concerning patient-reported general and gastrointestinal side effects except for xerostomia and dysphagia, but of the patients participating in both in- and outpatient oncology nurse counseling, 90.0% were better able to cope with general side effects of treatment. Patients with in- and outpatient structured systematic nutritional counseling more frequently received nutritional information (p = 0.001), were better at gauging food intolerances (p = 0.023), and followed the dietician's advice in cases of gastrointestinal side effects significantly more often (p = 0.003) than control patients. Counselor-reported outcomes concerning gastrointestinal side effects showed improvement in most of the patients taking part in systematic in- and outpatient nutritional counseling, except for weight loss in 4 patients.
Conclusion
In- and outpatient counseling in discharge and side effects management and nutrition improve the outcomes of colorectal cancer patients. Outpatient counseling should be further developed and evaluated in future studies.
“…Only few studies have explored the effect of nurse-led nutritional interventions among this patient group, yet the results have been promising. A multidisciplinary team approach for nutritional interventions (individual recipes, nutritional risk screening, total energy requirement calculation, education and diet adjustments) conducted by specialist nurses has obtained a positive effect on pre-albumin levels among CRC patients undergoing chemotherapy [21]. An individualised educational program with face-to-face and telephone counselling gained positive results on energy and total protein intake among patients with CRC (n = 19 + 21) in palliative care context [22].…”
Background
Chemotherapy-induced side effects may have a negative effect on nutrition intake, thus increasing the risk of malnutrition and consequently, other serious complications for patients with cancer. The prevalence of malnutrition is common among patients with colorectal cancer. Nurse-led empowering education may have a positive effect on self-care activity in this patient group. Therefore, our purpose is to develop an empowering educational nursing intervention and test its effect on self-care activation and knowledge level among patients with colorectal cancer during chemotherapy. Secondary outcomes are quality of life and risk of malnutrition.
Methods
An interdisciplinary expert group developed a face-to-face empowering educational intervention using teach-back method. A two-arm, single-centre, superiority trial with stratified randomisation (1:1) and pre-post measures will be used to assess the effect of the intervention compared to standard care. Patients (N = 40 + 40) will be recruited in one university hospital outpatient clinic in Finland. Eligibility criteria are adult patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer starting oral fluoropyrimidine or combination chemotherapy treatment. A registered nurse experienced in oncology will deliver the intervention 2 weeks after the first chemotherapy. Outcomes are measured before intervention (M0) and after a two-month follow-up period (M1).
Discussion
This study will assess whether nurse-led empowering education using teach-back method is effective on self-care activity among patients with colorectal cancer. If the intervention has a positive effect, it may be implemented into patient education in a corresponding context.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04160650 Registered 12 November 2019 - retrospectively registered
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.