A Multidisciplinary Spine Surgical Indications Conference Leads to Alterations in Surgical Plans in a Significant Number of Cases

Abstract

Study Design. Case series. Objective. To evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary spine surgery indications conference (MSSIC) on surgical planning for elective spine surgeries. Summary of Background Data. Identifying methods for pairing the proper patient with the optimal intervention is of the utmost importance for improving spine care and patient outcomes. Prior studies have evaluated the utility of multidisciplinary spine conferences for patient management, but none have evaluated the impact of a MSSIC on surgical planning and decision making. Methods. We implemented a mandatory weekly MSSIC with all spine surgeons at our institution. Each elective spine surgery in the upcoming week is presented. Subsequently, a group consensus decision is achieved regarding the best treatment option based on the expertise and opinions of the participating surgeons. We reviewed cases presented at the MSSIC from September 2019 to December 2019. We compared the surgeon's initial proposed surgery for a patient with the conference attendees’ consensus decision on the best treatment and measured compliance rates with the group's recommended treatment. Results. The conference reviewed 100 patients scheduled for elective spine surgery at our indications conference during the study period. Surgical plans were recommended for alteration in 19 cases (19%) with the proportion statistically significant from zero indicated by a binomial test (P < 0.001). The median absolute change in the invasiveness index of the altered procedures was 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 1–4). Participating surgeons complied with the group's recommendation in 96.5% of cases. Conclusion. In conjunction with other multidisciplinary methods, MSSICs can lead to surgical planning alterations in a significant number of cases. This could potentially result in better selection of surgical candidates and procedures for particular patients. Although long-term patient outcomes remain to be evaluated, this care model will likely play an integral role in optimizing the care spine surgeons provide patients. Level of Evidence: 4

Online access to spine care: do institutions advertise themselves as multidisciplinary?

“…Optimally, the patient could instead initially have been scheduled for an appointment with a physiatrist at the online point of access. It is well understood that multidisciplinary spine care is optimal, and institutions with truly multidisciplinary systems internally would be expected at the least to provide initial multidisciplinary web browsing experiences with central institutional spine care sites linking patients to the spectrum of operative and nonoperative care resources and providers, with guidance to patients on how to obtain the proper care ( 15 , 16 ). Given how the service industry has evolved so that scheduling a restaurant reservation or even a haircut can be done with ease, the healthcare industry and from our results, need for spine care in particular, remains far behind in streamlining accessible, integrated experience for patients.…”

Combining time-driven activity-based costing and lean methodology: an initial study of single-level lumbar fusion surgery to assess value-based healthcare in patients undergoing spine surgery

“…7 Variability in preoperative spine care pathways, decisions for lumbar fusion surgery, and postoperative spine care pathways has created an arena where standardization strategies can be used and highlighted. 8,9 The variability in care pathways, unfortunately, has created an obstacle for the study of specific time-driven data points. Thus, TDABC may only be applied to very functional systems in which a patient's care pathway is understood in granular fashion.…”