2020
DOI: 10.1111/fcre.12506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multidisciplinary Perspective on the Role, Functions, and Effectiveness of Parenting Coordination

Abstract: Based on a survey conducted in 2018 in collaboration with the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts’ (AFCC) Task Force on Parenting Coordination, this paper explores issues related to the process and perceived outcomes of parenting coordination for families post separation and divorce. The views expressed emerge from a diverse and multidisciplinary sample (n = 289) from legal, mental health, and conflict resolution backgrounds. Almost half of all participants (46%) were mental health professionals (psy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A = The number of the items corresponds to the numbering of the original scale [26] presented in the Supplementary Materials; i = inverse item; M, SD, Skw., Kur., HIc and I Alpha = mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, and corrected homogeneity index, respectively, and Cronbach's alpha of the scale if the item is removed, respectively, found in the calibration sample; C = calibration sample (50% approx., n = 1239); V = validation sample (50% approx., N = 1188). 1,2 In the validation sample, male = 20.03% The model found by Feinberg et al [26] of 30 items and six factors, Model CRS 6F , does not fit the data from the sample of Spanish engaged parents (Eg) and separated or divorced parents (S&D). Both methods, sCFA and CFA, allow us to conclude the same result.…”
Section: Evidence Of Validity Based On the Internal Structure And Rel...mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A = The number of the items corresponds to the numbering of the original scale [26] presented in the Supplementary Materials; i = inverse item; M, SD, Skw., Kur., HIc and I Alpha = mean, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, and corrected homogeneity index, respectively, and Cronbach's alpha of the scale if the item is removed, respectively, found in the calibration sample; C = calibration sample (50% approx., n = 1239); V = validation sample (50% approx., N = 1188). 1,2 In the validation sample, male = 20.03% The model found by Feinberg et al [26] of 30 items and six factors, Model CRS 6F , does not fit the data from the sample of Spanish engaged parents (Eg) and separated or divorced parents (S&D). Both methods, sCFA and CFA, allow us to conclude the same result.…”
Section: Evidence Of Validity Based On the Internal Structure And Rel...mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This is expected to be the case, among other things, due to the distribution of the factors found by Feinberg et al [26] in the two factors found in this research, as described before. (2) Examine to what extent different variables (e.g., sexual orientation, culture, years divorced, number of children, religion or training received for parenting, being in child-parent reunification processes, and being adoptive parents) exert an added moderating effect on the previous differences [10,11,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations