2022
DOI: 10.17535/crorr.2022.0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multidimensional Decision Making for Supplier Selection in the presence of Information Systems

Abstract: Information Systems (IS) have turned into vital means for companies to survive in the contemporary technology-oriented environment. Subsequently, over the last decades, this has brought about the heavy investment of companies in ISs to guarantee high-quality products and services. Similarly, supplier selection (SS) plays an inescapable role in today’s business. In addition, there are several studies published showing the importance of the ISs in the SS problem. However, there has not been any work evaluating t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, our preferred approach, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) [20], excels in handling uncertainties and aligns seamlessly with the complexities of cyberloafing determinants, providing a more pragmatic choice compared to PROMETHEE II and ELECTRE III. Kazemitash and Fazlollahtabar [12] proposed a comprehensive model for evaluating Information Systems on the Social Sustainability problem, utilizing the Best Worst Method (BWM). While BWM showcased advantages like requiring fewer pairwise comparisons, our chosen methodology, Fuzzy AHP, outperforms by adeptly handling uncertainties and imprecise judgments.…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, our preferred approach, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) [20], excels in handling uncertainties and aligns seamlessly with the complexities of cyberloafing determinants, providing a more pragmatic choice compared to PROMETHEE II and ELECTRE III. Kazemitash and Fazlollahtabar [12] proposed a comprehensive model for evaluating Information Systems on the Social Sustainability problem, utilizing the Best Worst Method (BWM). While BWM showcased advantages like requiring fewer pairwise comparisons, our chosen methodology, Fuzzy AHP, outperforms by adeptly handling uncertainties and imprecise judgments.…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%