2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11089-020-00934-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multidimensional Approach to Understanding Religious Conversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering this, the researcher proposes to use language and rhetoric as means of identifying and fixing the conversion on the basis of which self-conversion takes place. L. Taylor (2021) proposes to return to scientific studies of conversion such an important component as the subjective one, which reveals the self-identification of a person, in the process of which the individual gives an answer about their belonging to the category of converts. The researcher notes that such people are more qualified to identify converts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering this, the researcher proposes to use language and rhetoric as means of identifying and fixing the conversion on the basis of which self-conversion takes place. L. Taylor (2021) proposes to return to scientific studies of conversion such an important component as the subjective one, which reveals the self-identification of a person, in the process of which the individual gives an answer about their belonging to the category of converts. The researcher notes that such people are more qualified to identify converts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researcher notes that such people are more qualified to identify converts. Taking this into account, L. Taylor (2021) believes that the use of various considered rhetorical indicators of conversion allows distinguishing individuals by the presence of conversion experience. R. Le Poidevin (2021) emphasizes that "conversion" should be clearly distinguished from "initiation" because they are two fundamentally different forms of religious participation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term deconversion , leaving a religion, as a contrast to the term conversion, is also commonly used (Streib, 2021 ). Studies on conversion have been conducted for decades (Rambo, 1999 ; Taylor, 2021 ), but according to Gooren ( 2007 ) this research lacks attention to disaffiliation. According to Streib and Keller ( 2004 ), the process of deconversion involves intellectual doubt, emotional uneasiness or distress, and moral criticism culminating in disaffiliation from a religious organization.…”
Section: Introduction and Aimmentioning
confidence: 99%