2022
DOI: 10.1089/can.2020.0129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multicriteria Decision Analysis Comparing Pharmacotherapy for Chronic Neuropathic Pain, Including Cannabinoids and Cannabis-Based Medical Products

Abstract: Background: Pharmacological management of chronic neuropathic pain (CNP) still represents a major clinical challenge. Collective harnessing of both the scientific evidence base and clinical experience (of clinicians and patients) can play a key role in informing treatment pathways and contribute to the debate on specific treatments (e.g., cannabinoids). A group of expert clinicians (pain specialists and psychiatrists), scientists, and patient representatives convened to assess the relative benefit-safety balan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, long-term opioid treatment in non-specific pain patients delivered good pain relief in only 51% of patients ( 37 ). Although Cochrane review of neuropathic pain treated with cannabis-based medicines against placebo, found a modest gain from 16 studies ( n = 1,750) with 21 vs. 17% achieving a 50% reduction in pain; and 39 vs. 33% achieving a 30% reduction ( 46 ), a multiple-criteria decision analysis found that the benefit-safety profiles for cannabinoids were higher than for other commonly used medications for chronic neuropathic pain largely because they contribute more to QOL and have a more favorable side-effect profile ( 47 ). Furthermore, for patients with chronic pain, opioids may contribute to substantial functional impairment ( 48 ), so serious adverse effects of opioids may limit effectiveness in some patients, even if adequate analgesia is achieved ( 48 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, long-term opioid treatment in non-specific pain patients delivered good pain relief in only 51% of patients ( 37 ). Although Cochrane review of neuropathic pain treated with cannabis-based medicines against placebo, found a modest gain from 16 studies ( n = 1,750) with 21 vs. 17% achieving a 50% reduction in pain; and 39 vs. 33% achieving a 30% reduction ( 46 ), a multiple-criteria decision analysis found that the benefit-safety profiles for cannabinoids were higher than for other commonly used medications for chronic neuropathic pain largely because they contribute more to QOL and have a more favorable side-effect profile ( 47 ). Furthermore, for patients with chronic pain, opioids may contribute to substantial functional impairment ( 48 ), so serious adverse effects of opioids may limit effectiveness in some patients, even if adequate analgesia is achieved ( 48 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to side effects and a low efficacy, the pain intensity remains of considerable clinical importance. The discovery of the crucial role of the endocannabinoid system in pain opened new therapeutic perspectives [ 20 , 21 ], and the introduction of cannabis therapy for chronic pain has been successful [ 3 , 22 ], as demonstrated by several studies [ 23 26 ]. Medical cannabis products were recently well-summarized by Brunetti et al [ 5 ], with the rationale to help doctors with dosing and titration strategies for THC and CBD preparations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results indicate that cannabis might be regarded as a complementary and effective anti-cancer treatment for OC. Given the favorable safety profile of phytocannabinoids compared to standard pharmacotherapy (e.g., [34]), we propose that clinical trials with cannabis-based products are needed desperately for OC patients. the manuscript.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%