2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11239-022-02714-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multicentre observational study of the prevalence, management, and outcomes of subsegmental pulmonary embolism

Abstract: Background The incidence of subsegmental pulmonary embolism (SSPE) has increased with improvements in imaging technology. There is clinical equipoise for SSPE treatment, with conflicting evidence of improved mortality or reduced venous thromboembolism recurrence with anticoagulation. SSPE studies have significant heterogeneity and often lack adequately matched disease comparator groups. Objectives To determine the prevalence, management, and outcomes of SS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pulmonary embolism (PE) confined to the subsegmental pulmonary arteries, known as subsegmental PE, has increased in prevalence as detection capacities of computed tomography pulmonary arteriography (CTPA) have improved. Approximately 3% to 12% of PEs diagnosed using CTPA are subsegmental . The pharmacological treatment of patients with low-risk subsegmental PE is contested .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pulmonary embolism (PE) confined to the subsegmental pulmonary arteries, known as subsegmental PE, has increased in prevalence as detection capacities of computed tomography pulmonary arteriography (CTPA) have improved. Approximately 3% to 12% of PEs diagnosed using CTPA are subsegmental . The pharmacological treatment of patients with low-risk subsegmental PE is contested .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately 3% to 12% of PEs diagnosed using CTPA are subsegmental. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 The pharmacological treatment of patients with low-risk subsegmental PE is contested. 4 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 It is unclear whether the risk of progressive or recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) is sufficiently elevated to justify anticoagulation for all patients with subsegmental PE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%