2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-012-1502-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multicentre case series of tibia fractures treated with the Expert Tibia Nail (ETN)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Metaphyseal fractures will not be corrected by introducing the nail, whether it be antegrade or retrograde. If malalignment is present during nail insertion, the fracture will most likely be stabilized in a non-anatomical position [24,25]. Therefore, prior reduction and careful control of the fragments while introducing the nail across the fracture line are crucial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metaphyseal fractures will not be corrected by introducing the nail, whether it be antegrade or retrograde. If malalignment is present during nail insertion, the fracture will most likely be stabilized in a non-anatomical position [24,25]. Therefore, prior reduction and careful control of the fragments while introducing the nail across the fracture line are crucial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the reported average time to union was approximately 20 weeks for simple fractures that had been caused by a low-energy mechanism and over 30 weeks for comminuted fractures that had been caused by a high-energy mechanism. Different authors also reported that fractures of the middle third of the tibia usually healed in an average of 12 weeks, and little variation in healing time relative to the type of fracture was noted [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, unreamed nailing is associated with an increased rate of delayed and nonunion [ 31 , 35 , 54 ]. Attal et al found that tibia fractures within the mid-diaphysis, followed by the distal third had a higher rate of delayed union versus proximal third fractures (16.7 & 10.5 % versus 5.9 %) [ 5 ]. Again, this would logically seem to be related toward the issue of available soft tissue coverage and blood supply.…”
Section: Delayed Union and Nonunionmentioning
confidence: 93%