The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multicenter validation of computerized tomography models as predictors of non- optimal primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of the performance among each newly-described tool is warranted and should identify the most accurate model estimating cytoreduction; addition of molecular markers may further refine these tools. However, as observed with prior experiences, external validation is essential as prior efforts to accurately estimate primary surgical resection of EOC have not been sustained when applied to other populations for validation after initial development [11,34]. Estimation of successful resection in EOC has been an elusive and longstanding goal, but one that would be immensely helpful to reach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparison of the performance among each newly-described tool is warranted and should identify the most accurate model estimating cytoreduction; addition of molecular markers may further refine these tools. However, as observed with prior experiences, external validation is essential as prior efforts to accurately estimate primary surgical resection of EOC have not been sustained when applied to other populations for validation after initial development [11,34]. Estimation of successful resection in EOC has been an elusive and longstanding goal, but one that would be immensely helpful to reach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Previous approaches to estimate cytoreduction have included assessment of disease distribution using intraoperative mapping of tumor dissemination [33], use of models based on CT imaging [34], and preoperative patient characteristics [35]. Most prior algorithms have aimed to estimate the probability of suboptimal cytoreduction at initial surgery, including a recent prospective study outlining a scoring system based on preoperative CA-125, ASA, and six preoperative CT findings [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already acknowledged (Bristow et al, 2000;Cooper et al, 2002), a multi-institutional prospective trial hopefully integrating preoperative clinical and radiographic variables is required to test whether the predictive models maintain their accuracy when applied to different patient cohorts. Indeed, a very recently published study by Gemer et al (2009) has underscored the difficulty to devise generally applicable models able to reliably predict surgical outcome in advanced ovarian cancer patients, across different Institutions. This issue can become clinically more relevant in the light of the upcoming mature results from EORTC 55971 trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, Gerestein et al examined 115 patients and found DPT and the presence of ascites to be most predictive [19]. Gemer et al performed validation measurements of several studies [10,[12][13][14] and found lack of confirmation of their metrics [20]. In addition to utilizing CT scan findings to predict suboptimal cytoreduction, others have attempted to predict ability to achieve an optimal cytoreduction using various preoperative tests, including non-CT imaging and CA-125 [12,13,15,[21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%