2016
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multicenter, single‐arm, open‐label, phase 2 study of apitolisib (GDC‐0980) for the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma (MAGGIE study)

Abstract: BACKGROUND This single arm, open-label trial was designed to evaluate the activity of apitolisib (GDC-0980), a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, in patients with advanced endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS Patients with recurrent or persistent EC treated with 1–2 prior lines of chemotherapy but no prior PI3K/mTOR inhibitor received oral apitolisib 40 mg daily during 28-day cycles until progression or intolerable toxicity. Type I/II diabetic patients requiring insulin were excluded. The primary endpoints were progressi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(41 reference statements)
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A current clinical trial (NCT02059265) is testing the multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib in clear cell ovarian and endometrial carcinomas with ARID1A loss (Miller et al, 2016). PI3K inhibition has been successful in advanced endometrial cancers with responses seen in patients with pathway alterations despite some limitations due to tolerability (Makker et al, 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A current clinical trial (NCT02059265) is testing the multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor dasatinib in clear cell ovarian and endometrial carcinomas with ARID1A loss (Miller et al, 2016). PI3K inhibition has been successful in advanced endometrial cancers with responses seen in patients with pathway alterations despite some limitations due to tolerability (Makker et al, 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, there appears to be a higher level of toxicity among patients with endometrial cancer compared to other solid tumors. This finding has been observed in other studies in recurrent endometrial cancer, where previously identified recommended Phase II doses had to be reduced due to patient tolerance . To date, the etiology of the increased toxicity has not been elucidated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Specifically, a recent phase 2 study of BKM‐120, a pan‐class 1 PI3K inhibitor, in advanced endometrial cancer showed an ORR of 0% and excessive toxicity that necessitated a recruitment hold and dose reduction; 21% of patients discontinued BKM120 for toxicity . Similarly, studies of apitolisib (a dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor) and pilaralisib (a pan‐class 1 PI3K inhibitor) in advanced endometrial cancer both failed to meet their primary efficacy endpoints (6% ORR in both studies) . Although neither of these studies required PI3K pathway alteration for enrollment, it is noteworthy that all responders in the apitolisib study (n = 3) and all responders in the pilaralisib study (n = 4) harbored at least 1 PI3K pathway‐activating alteration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer March 15, 2020 inhibitor) in advanced endometrial cancer both failed to meet their primary efficacy endpoints (6% ORR in both studies). 12,13 Although neither of these studies required PI3K pathway alteration for enrollment, it is noteworthy that all responders in the apitolisib study (n = 3) and all responders in the pilaralisib study (n = 4) harbored at least 1 PI3K pathway-activating alteration. Similar to our findings, the responding patients in these studies harbored mixed cell type or serous histology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation