2018
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.tps395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients (pts) with prostate cancer (pc) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) receiving degarelix (GnRH receptor antagonist) or leuprolide (GnRH receptor agonist).

Abstract: TPS395 Background: Epidemiological studies showed an association between GnRH agonists and a long-term increased risk of CVD, early after treatment initiation and with a higher risk seen in pts with pre-existing CVD. Retrospective pooled safety analyses of 6 randomized trials showed that significantly fewer pts treated with the GnRH receptor antagonists, degarelix, had a CV event or death compared with pts receiving a GnRH receptor agonist. In those studies showing an increased CV risk, Androgen-Deprivation T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results are currently awaited from the PRO-NOUNCE trial, a large randomised trial of 545 people evaluating major cardiovascular events between LHRH agonist vs antagonist treated patients. 50 To summarise, in this unique study using registry-based data, there is evidence of an association between ADT for nonmetastatic PCa and a higher risk of CVD events, especially in those with some CVD risk factors present at the time of their diagnosis and longer duration of treatment. We also found higher all-cause mortality among patients receiving ADT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results are currently awaited from the PRO-NOUNCE trial, a large randomised trial of 545 people evaluating major cardiovascular events between LHRH agonist vs antagonist treated patients. 50 To summarise, in this unique study using registry-based data, there is evidence of an association between ADT for nonmetastatic PCa and a higher risk of CVD events, especially in those with some CVD risk factors present at the time of their diagnosis and longer duration of treatment. We also found higher all-cause mortality among patients receiving ADT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These findings need further investigation but could offer a biomarker for clinicians to identify patients more suitable for treatment with an LHRH antagonist. Results are currently awaited from the PRONOUNCE trial, a large randomised trial of 545 people evaluating major cardiovascular events between LHRH agonist vs antagonist treated patients 50 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%