2021
DOI: 10.34172/aim.2021.65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multicenter Diagnostic Accuracy Study on Prehospital Stroke Screening Scales

Abstract: Background: Stroke is one of the most common debilitating diseases. Although effective treatment is available, a golden time has been defined in this regard. Therefore, prompt action is needed to identify patients with stroke as soon as possible, even in the pre-hospital stage. In recent years, several clinical scales have been introduced for this purpose. We performed the present study to examine the accuracy of eight clinical scales in terms of stroke diagnosis. Methods: This multicenter diagnostic accuracy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recently evaluated the accuracy of previous known clinical tools with the same gold standard for the final diagnosis of AIS, as we used here in this study. 7 To reduce the interpretation bias, we made our discussion based on the findings of our previous survey, and compared the characteristics of the new tool with previous ones. At the best cut-off point, the new clinical tool had 89.3% accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We recently evaluated the accuracy of previous known clinical tools with the same gold standard for the final diagnosis of AIS, as we used here in this study. 7 To reduce the interpretation bias, we made our discussion based on the findings of our previous survey, and compared the characteristics of the new tool with previous ones. At the best cut-off point, the new clinical tool had 89.3% accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding revealed higher accuracy of the new tool than that of all other clinical tools in our previous study. 7 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latest comparative study, Alijanpour et al [ 24 ] compared the sensitivity and specificity of six scales: FAST, CPSS, LAPSS, Los Angeles Motor Scale (LAMS), and The Finnish Pre-hospital Stroke Scale (FPSS), and failed to find which scale is better for early identification of stroke. So did Saberian [ 25 ]. Therefore, the available evidence does not prove which tool is more suitable yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important measures was the reduction of wasting time both at the pre-hospital phase and also after admission to the emergency department (ED) [ 10 , 11 ]. Several stroke screening tools have been designed in this regard that can accurately predict stroke [ 11 ], that mostly applied in prehospital setting and their performance has been rarely evaluated in ED environment. Rapid Arterial oCclusion Evaluation (RACE) scale is one of such tools that designed by Pérez de la Ossa et al not only for screening the stroke cases, but also to differentiate large vessel occlusion (LVO) cases than the others [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, various interventions have been considered and applied by health care systems during the last decades to reduce the time between AIS onset and starting an appropriate management [7][8][9]. One of the most important measures was the reduction of wasting time both at the pre-hospital phase and also after admission to the emergency department (ED) [10,11]. Several stroke screening tools have been designed in this regard that can accurately predict stroke [11], that mostly applied in prehospital setting and their performance has been rarely evaluated in ED environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%