2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiaxial criterion for notch high-cycle fatigue using a critical-point method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the region of the critical crack is not known in advance, the point and the average stress methods offer a significant advantage with respect to the other CDT methods, because they are easier to implement, following these steps: (1) obtain the elastic stress field; (2) select the critical regions by applying a strength criteria; and (3) apply the point or average stress method for several angles at any selected point [101][102][103]. With this procedure, it is also possible to predict the crack orientation.…”
Section: Discussion On the Cdtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the region of the critical crack is not known in advance, the point and the average stress methods offer a significant advantage with respect to the other CDT methods, because they are easier to implement, following these steps: (1) obtain the elastic stress field; (2) select the critical regions by applying a strength criteria; and (3) apply the point or average stress method for several angles at any selected point [101][102][103]. With this procedure, it is also possible to predict the crack orientation.…”
Section: Discussion On the Cdtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…multiaxial fatigue criterion based on the so-called critical plane approach has been proposed by Carpinteri and Spagnoli to estimate the high-cycle fatigue strength (either endurance limit or fatigue lifetime) of both smooth and notched structural components [12][13][14][15][16][17]. The main steps of the C-S criterion are as follows: (i) Averaged directions of the principal stress axes are determined on the basis of their instantaneous directions; (ii) The orientation of the initial (hereafter termed critical) crack plane and that of the final fracture plane are linked to the averaged directions of the principal stress axes (two material parameters are required at this step: fatigue limit In the following sub-sections, the C-S criterion is briefly reviewed, and an extension to the fatigue assessment of welded structural components under in-and out-of-phase loadings is discussed [18].…”
Section: The C-s Criterionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some experimental results [11] on welded steel joints show a decrease of fatigue life in presence of out-of-phase multiaxial loadings as compared to fatigue life under in-phase multiaxial loadings. The critical plane-based multiaxial fatigue criterion proposed by Carpinteri and Spagnoli (the C-S criterion) for smooth and notched specimens [12][13][14][15][16][17] has recently been extended to welded structural components by employing the nominal stresses [18]. In the present paper, a comparison between lifetime predictions and experimental data available in the literature [11,[19][20][21] is carried out, for both in-phase and out-of-phase biaxial cyclic loadings with constant amplitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origins of the TCD are located in the middle of the twentieth century [11,12], but in the last two decades this theory has had a wider development, providing answers to different scientific and engineering problems (e.g., [3,6,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]). …”
Section: Theoretical Background: the Line Methods And Apparent Fracturmentioning
confidence: 99%