2020
DOI: 10.3390/galaxies8010015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-Wavelength View of OJ 287 Activity in 2015–2017: Implications of Spectral Changes on Central-Engine Models and MeV-GeV Emission Mechanism

Abstract: A diverse range of observational results and peculiar properties across the domains of observation have made OJ 287 one of the best-explored BL Lac objects on the issues of relativistic jets and accretion physics as well as the strong theory of gravity. We here present a brief compilation of observational results from the literature and inferences/insights from the extensive studies but focus on the interpretation of its ∼ 12-yr quasi-periodic optical outbursts (QPOOs) and high energy emission mechanisms. The … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
(250 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If this interpretation is indeed the case, it requires strong dynamical mechanisms with very efficient radiative output -like that of accretion or jet to account for these spectral features with dynamical forces peaking around the expected QPOOs to drive the spectral changes. On the other hand, the thermal-like NIRoptical spectral break (Kushwaha et al, 2018a, Seyfert-like soft X-ray excess (Pal et al, 2020), and iron line absorption feature (Komossa et al, 2020) are broadly consistent with the elements of the disk-impact BBH interpretation -the NIR-spectral break with a ∼ 10 10 M SMBH accretion disk spectrum (Kushwaha et al, 2018a;Kushwaha, 2020; or even with the thermal bremsstrahlung (Rodríguez-Ramírez et al, 2020) proposition while Seyfert-like soft X-ray excess (Pal et al, 2020) as well as iron absorption feature (Komossa et al, 2020), are expected in case of a standard accretion-disk and outflows.…”
Section: Accretion Physicssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If this interpretation is indeed the case, it requires strong dynamical mechanisms with very efficient radiative output -like that of accretion or jet to account for these spectral features with dynamical forces peaking around the expected QPOOs to drive the spectral changes. On the other hand, the thermal-like NIRoptical spectral break (Kushwaha et al, 2018a, Seyfert-like soft X-ray excess (Pal et al, 2020), and iron line absorption feature (Komossa et al, 2020) are broadly consistent with the elements of the disk-impact BBH interpretation -the NIR-spectral break with a ∼ 10 10 M SMBH accretion disk spectrum (Kushwaha et al, 2018a;Kushwaha, 2020; or even with the thermal bremsstrahlung (Rodríguez-Ramírez et al, 2020) proposition while Seyfert-like soft X-ray excess (Pal et al, 2020) as well as iron absorption feature (Komossa et al, 2020), are expected in case of a standard accretion-disk and outflows.…”
Section: Accretion Physicssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Isobe et al, 2001, and references therein) and during and after the latest 2015 outburst implies a connection between the two (e.g. Kushwaha, 2020). Such strong spectral changes are inconsistent with the simple jet-precession scenarios (Britzen et al, 2018;Butuzova & Pushkarev, 2020, and references therein) invoked for the QPOOs in which only achromatic flux boosting is expected without any spectral changes.…”
Section: Accretion Physicsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Variability reflects a change in the dynamical state of the system responsible for the observable and thus, offers direct access to scales and dynamics of the system except that in non-linear systems, a one-to-one relation between the observable and underlying dynamics is not clear apparently, (e.g., [13]). Similar problems exist for statistical exploration-widely different systems with almost no common physical connection can exhibit similar statistical behavior, (e.g., [14,15]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%