2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-019-04072-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-start ILS–RVND algorithm with adaptive solution acceptance for the CVRP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two standard benchmark datasets of CVRP are selected, and the results are compared with other algorithms to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of different algorithms for solving the problem. The algorithms used for comparison include SMA-CSA, ISOS, EACO [ 67 ], LNS-ACO [ 68 ], ILS–RVND [ 69 , 70 ], GRELS [ 71 ], AGES [ 72 ], and HGPSO [ 73 ].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two standard benchmark datasets of CVRP are selected, and the results are compared with other algorithms to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of different algorithms for solving the problem. The algorithms used for comparison include SMA-CSA, ISOS, EACO [ 67 ], LNS-ACO [ 68 ], ILS–RVND [ 69 , 70 ], GRELS [ 71 ], AGES [ 72 ], and HGPSO [ 73 ].…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The good results of SMA-CSA in benchmark functions (F1–F7) show the performance of the SMA-CSA algorithm in terms of exploitation and local optimum avoidance. Moreover, the algorithm is applied to the capacitated vehicle routing problem (CVRP) and compared to other algorithms such as ISOS, EACO [ 67 ], LNS-ACO [ 68 ], ILS–RVND [ 69 , 70 ], GRELS [ 71 ], AGES [ 72 ], and HGPSO [ 73 ], the results prove SMA-CSA has better optimization results and a more robust mean than other algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years MS-ILS algorithms have been proposed by several authors to solve different types of optimization problems, including the two-echelon routing problem (Nguyen et al, 2012), the periodic vehicle routing problem (Michallet et al, 2014), the mixed fleet vehicle routing problem (Sassi et al, 2015), the generalized quadratic multiple knapsack problem (Avci & Topaloglu, 2017), the uncapacitated single allocation hub location problem (Guan et al, 2018), the covering salesman problem (Venkatesh et al, 2019) and the capacitated vehicle routing problem (Gokalp & Ugur, 2020). However, no research was found of MS-ILS as a proposed method to solve the MRCPSP.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The − value method is used to assign the corresponding vehicles to each transport station. The error function is defined as = − ∑ ∈ (17) ℎ is the staging area, is the number of vehicles allocated, and is the proportion of waste to the total. After calculation, the vehicle allocation and the resulting error are shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Optimization Of Vehicle Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Lucía Cazabal-Valencia analyzed CVRP with ellipsoidal distances, which included an inventory model with uniformly distributed demands [15]; F.E. Zulvia proposed a hybrid ant-colony optimization and genetic algorithm for solving CVRP with a time window and fuzzy travel time and demand [16]; Osman Gokalp proposed a novel algorithm based on iterated local search and the random variable neighborhood descent metaheuristic method for the purpose of solving CVRP [17]; Mahmuda Akhtar presented a modified backtracking search algorithm in CVRP models, with the smart bin concept to find the best optimized waste collection path distances [18]; Sami Faiz developed a decision support system for solving CVRP that integrated GIS enriched by a tabu search model [19]; Chengming Qi proposed a two-stage hybrid Ant Colony System (ACS) algorithm for CVRP that minimized the number of vehicles used and travel cost [20]; A. Gomez presented a new artificial bee colony algorithm for solving CVRP [21]; M. Ammi and S. Chikhi proposed an island model for solving CVRP, which consists of using a paradigm, called the island model, that rules the cooperation held by different islands [22]; S.L. Gadegaard proposed a new polynomially sized formulation of the well-known symmetric CVRP [23]; Yiyong Xiao presented a mathematical optimization model to formally characterized the fuel consumption rate considered in CVRP [24]; Rodrigo Linfati proposed a heuristic algorithm for the reoptimization of CVRP in which the number of customers increases, which uses the proposed performance to reduce route dispersion and minimize length [25]; Jiashan Zhang presented a novel two-phase heuristic approach for the CVRP to overcome limitation [26]; Ali Asghar Rahmani Hosseinabadi introduced a new metaheuristic optimization algorithm to solve CVRP that is based on the law of gravity and group interactions [27]; Asma M. Altabeeb proposed a new hybrid firefly algorithm to solve CVRP [28]; Hadi Karimi investigated various stabilization techniques for improving the column generation algorithm and proposed a novel stabilization technique specialized for CVRP [29]; A.K.M.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%