2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.04.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-site approach toward assessing the effect of thinning on soil carbon contents across temperate pine, oak, and larch forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
9
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The IPCC guidelines do not stipulate default values in regard to the carbon stock of soil and dead organic matter, which do not change in the Tier 1 method; therefore, comparison with our results was not possible. The litter carbon stock was similar to the ranges indicated by previous studies focused on Korean forests; for example, Kim et al [29] reported that the litter carbon stock (Mg C/ha) in Korean forests ranges from 6.7 to 8.5 for pine forests, 4.6 to 5.0 for oak forests, and 6.5 to 7.0 for larch forests [29]. Other studies have reported litter carbon stocks of 7.2 for coniferous forests and 4.8 for deciduous forests at the national scale [11], as litter carbon stocks are generally given to be higher for coniferous species than for deciduous species [11,29].…”
Section: Development and Implications Of Country-specific Emission Fasupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The IPCC guidelines do not stipulate default values in regard to the carbon stock of soil and dead organic matter, which do not change in the Tier 1 method; therefore, comparison with our results was not possible. The litter carbon stock was similar to the ranges indicated by previous studies focused on Korean forests; for example, Kim et al [29] reported that the litter carbon stock (Mg C/ha) in Korean forests ranges from 6.7 to 8.5 for pine forests, 4.6 to 5.0 for oak forests, and 6.5 to 7.0 for larch forests [29]. Other studies have reported litter carbon stocks of 7.2 for coniferous forests and 4.8 for deciduous forests at the national scale [11], as litter carbon stocks are generally given to be higher for coniferous species than for deciduous species [11,29].…”
Section: Development and Implications Of Country-specific Emission Fasupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The litter carbon stock was similar to the ranges indicated by previous studies focused on Korean forests; for example, Kim et al [29] reported that the litter carbon stock (Mg C/ha) in Korean forests ranges from 6.7 to 8.5 for pine forests, 4.6 to 5.0 for oak forests, and 6.5 to 7.0 for larch forests [29]. Other studies have reported litter carbon stocks of 7.2 for coniferous forests and 4.8 for deciduous forests at the national scale [11], as litter carbon stocks are generally given to be higher for coniferous species than for deciduous species [11,29]. Furthermore, the literature shows that litter carbon stock is influenced by the varying composition and decomposition rates of different species [30,31].…”
Section: Development and Implications Of Country-specific Emission Fasupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It has been demonstrated that the management of forests can positively influence C sequestration [8][9][10]. The rate of growth for tree biomass can be increased by active management; therefore, the potential C sequestration rates in managed forests might increase too [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thinning enhances tree growth and the early productivity of forests [12], while soil C might exhibit initial losses with a later recovery once the canopy cover is restored [7]. The rates of C sequestration and storage in forest plantations managed by selective harvesting might, in the long term, exceed those of unmanaged forest plantations [10,11]. However, most of the studies about the influence of thinning on long-term forest C sequestration have been performed in northern latitudes and for mature forest, while there are few studies in semiarid ecosystems or for forest plantations (but see [13][14][15]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil organic carbon (SOC) can be stored in soils for thousands of years under, suitable conditions, and is a vital component of plant nutrient cycles [7]. Forest management aimed at increasing stand growth has been shown to be effective in increasing the C sequestration capacity [8,9]. Thinning treatments improve health and tree vigor, increasing forest productivity [10], while the soil C content shows a slight decrease in the first stages, recovering its level and increasing once the canopy is restored [11].Accurate estimation of forest biomass to produce spatially explicit mapping of forest C stocks over large study areas is of considerable interest nowadays [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%