2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-sensor approach for the on-orbit validation of ocean color satellite data products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
498
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 790 publications
(517 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
15
498
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We also acquired coincident Level-2 satellite-to-in situ match-ups for the NASA SeaWiFS and MODISA instruments from the OBPG (http://seabass.gsfc.nasa .gov/seabasscgi/validation_search.cgi). Satellite data processing and quality assurance for the matchups followed Bailey and Werdell [33]. Specifically: (1) temporal coincidence was defined as 3 h; (2) satellite values were the filtered median (via the semiinterquartile range) of all unmasked pixels in a 5 × 5 box centered on the in situ target; and (3) satellite values were excluded when the coefficient of variation for the given product within this box exceeded 0.15.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also acquired coincident Level-2 satellite-to-in situ match-ups for the NASA SeaWiFS and MODISA instruments from the OBPG (http://seabass.gsfc.nasa .gov/seabasscgi/validation_search.cgi). Satellite data processing and quality assurance for the matchups followed Bailey and Werdell [33]. Specifically: (1) temporal coincidence was defined as 3 h; (2) satellite values were the filtered median (via the semiinterquartile range) of all unmasked pixels in a 5 × 5 box centered on the in situ target; and (3) satellite values were excluded when the coefficient of variation for the given product within this box exceeded 0.15.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fulfilling this accuracy requirement is however challenged by uncertainties affecting the absolute and vicarious calibration of the space sensors, the atmospheric correction process and the bio-optical characteristics of the ocean (Gregg and Casey, 2004). Furthermore, global empirical algorithms, such as those used to operationally retrieve CHL, are derived from regression analyses of large in situ databases collected from waters around the world (O'Reilly et al, 1998;O'Reilly et al, 2000;Werdell and Bailey, 2005) and therefore have a tendency to perform well only at global scale (Bailey and Werdell, 2006;Bailey et al, 2000;Gregg and Casey, 2004;Hooker and McClain, 2000;O'Reilly et al, 1998). The accuracy limit for chlorophyll has been shown to be unrealistic for many open ocean regions, such as the Baltic Sea (Darecki and Stramski, 2004), the Southern Ocean (Kahru and Mitchell, 2010) and the Mediterranean Sea (Volpe et al, 2007).…”
Section: G Volpe Et Al: the Mediterranean Ocean Colour Observing Symentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each image contains the amplitude and phase information and some attributions such as corner longitude/latitude location, time, Doppler parameters, and other values processed by the processor. To produce simulated Radarsat-2 and TerraSAR-X images for MCDONNELL DOUGLAS MD-80 aircraft target we use the SAR processing software, Multi-Sensor Processor (MSP) (Bailey and Werdell 2006), which was verified by the general satellite data (Bailey and Werdell 2006). Both the simulated Radarsat-2 and TerraSAR-X images are used to compare and evaluate the results using the LBM method.…”
Section: The Results Of Sar Echo Signal Simulation For Md80mentioning
confidence: 99%