2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-scale framework for strategic management of diffuse pollution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Herein lies our argument that sub-catchments are a helpful unit of spatial scale. This is in line with the arguments of those who have also advocated the need for a twotiered approach to catchment management, combining broad regional policies with targeted management in high risk areas at the catchment and farm scale (Heathwaite et al, 2000;Hewett et al, 2009;Johnes et al, 2007).…”
Section: Rescaling Jurisdictions: the Catchment Approachsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Herein lies our argument that sub-catchments are a helpful unit of spatial scale. This is in line with the arguments of those who have also advocated the need for a twotiered approach to catchment management, combining broad regional policies with targeted management in high risk areas at the catchment and farm scale (Heathwaite et al, 2000;Hewett et al, 2009;Johnes et al, 2007).…”
Section: Rescaling Jurisdictions: the Catchment Approachsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Previous studies have focused on larger watersheds (Bartoli et al, 2012;Billen et al, 2012;Lassaletta et al, 2012) or regions Neumann et al, 2011), and are typically based on statistics and publicly-available geo-databases rather than empirically collected data. These studies provide valuable insight into the consequences of N hotspots at these regional scales, but there is a lack of knowledge concerning the interactions between the local farm management and the natural processes in specific landscapes with agricultural Npollution hotspots Dalgaard et al, 2011;Hewett et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The types of data taken at a point (1 km 2 ) may differ greatly from measurement made at small catchments (10 km 2 ) or in large areas (100 km 2 ). As we scale up from point to large area, we accept that there is degree of uncertainty [11].…”
Section: Upscalingmentioning
confidence: 99%